Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Distribution of Chlamydia trachomatis ompA-genotypes over three decades in Portugal
  1. Zohra Lodhia1,
  2. Dora Cordeiro1,
  3. Cristina Correia1,
  4. Inês João1,
  5. Teresa Carreira1,
  6. Luís Vieira2,
  7. Alexandra Nunes3,4,
  8. Rita Ferreira3,
  9. Sandra Schäfer5,
  10. Elzara Aliyeva5,
  11. Clara Portugal5,
  12. Isabel Monge5,
  13. Maria Ana Pessanha6,
  14. Cristina Toscano6,
  15. Rita Côrte-Real7,
  16. Marília Antunes8,
  17. Joao Paulo Gomes3,4,
  18. Vítor Borges3,
  19. Maria José Borrego1
  1. 1National Reference Laboratory (NRL) for Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, INSA, IP), Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  2. 2Technology and Innovation Unit, Department of Human Genetics, National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, INSA, IP), Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  3. 3Genomics and Bioinformatics Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health (Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, INSA, IP), Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  4. 4Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusófona University-Lisbon University Centre, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  5. 5Clinical Pathology Department, Unidade Local de Saúde Amadora Sintra, Amadora, Portugal
  6. 6Laboratory of microbiology and molecular biology, Department of Clinical Pathology, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental EPE, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  7. 7Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Department of Clinical Pathology, Unidade Local de Saúde São José – Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  8. 8Centro de Estatística e Aplicações, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Maria José Borrego; M.Jose.Borrego{at}insa.min-saude.pt

Abstract

Objectives Chlamydia trachomatis is classified into 15 major genotypes, A to L3, based on the diversity of ompA gene. Here, we evaluated and characterised the distribution and diversity of ompA-genotypes over 32 years (1990–2021) in Portugal.

Methods The collection of the Portuguese National Reference Laboratory for Sexually Transmitted Infections includes 5824 C. trachomatis-positive samples that were successfully ompA-genotyped between 1990 and 2021. An in-depth analysis of ompA-genotypes distribution across the years, as well as by biological sex, age and anatomical site of infection was performed.

Results ompA-genotype E was consistently the most frequently detected across the years, with a median frequency of 34.6%, followed by D/Da (17.6%), F (14.3%) and G (10.7%). The prevalence of lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) genotypes (mostly L2, 62.0%, followed by L2b, 32.1%) increased since 2016, reaching the highest value in 2019 (20.9%). LGV, G and Da genotypes were associated with biological sex, specifically with being male, and were the most frequent among anorectal specimens (37.7%, 19.4% and 17.7%, respectively). Notably, LGV ompA-genotypes represented 38.9% of the male anorectal specimens since 2016, and were also detected among oropharynx and urogenital samples. ompA-genotype E was the most frequently detected at the oropharynx (28.6%) and urogenital (33.9%) sites during the study period, followed by D/Da (17.4%) and F (16.0%) in the urogenital specimens, and by G (26.1%) and D/Da (25.7%) in oropharynx specimens. Our data also highlight the emergence of the recombinant L2b/D-Da strain since 2017 (representing between 2.0% and 15.5% of LGV cases per year) and the non-negligible detection of ompA-genotype B in urogenital and anorectal specimens.

Conclusions This study provides a comprehensive landscape of C. trachomatis molecular surveillance in Portugal, highlighting the continued relevance of ompA-genotyping as a complement to rapid LGV-specific detection tests. It also contributes to a deeper understanding of C. trachomatis epidemiology, diversity and pathogenicity.

  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • lymphogranuloma venereum
  • bacterial typing techniques
  • molecular typing
  • molecular epidemiology

Data availability statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11518772.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Handling editor David Regan

  • X @anunes

  • Contributors ZL wrote the paper; ZL, MA, VB and MJB analysed the data; SS, EA, CP, IM, MAP, CT and RC-R provided samples and data; ZL, DC, CC, IJ, TC, AN, RF, VB, LV, JPG and MJB performed ompA-genotyping. All revised the manuscript. MJB is the guarantor.

  • Funding The work by MA is partially financed by national funds through Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia under the project UIDB/00006/2020 (https://doi.org/10.54499/UIDB/00006/2020).

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.