In our area the high HIV prevalence has made the interpretation of
syphilis tests paticularly problematic. Coinfected patients do appear to
reactivate their treponemal infection or possibly reinfection with a
different "strain" in the presence of profound immunosuppression. As with
some other agents IgM can persist for several years with peaks and
troughs! Non-treponemal tests are uniformly negative whilst...
In our area the high HIV prevalence has made the interpretation of
syphilis tests paticularly problematic. Coinfected patients do appear to
reactivate their treponemal infection or possibly reinfection with a
different "strain" in the presence of profound immunosuppression. As with
some other agents IgM can persist for several years with peaks and
troughs! Non-treponemal tests are uniformly negative whilst TPHA levels
can fluctuate widely! It is perhaps unfortunate that reference labs may
have developed their algorithms in the face of conventional syphilis
diagnosis - these do little to help with HIV coinfected patients.
Denis McElborough
Public Health Laboratory
Royal Sussex County Hospital
Eastern Road, Brighton, UK
Fether at al present a very interesting case control study on
STIs in women who have sex with women (WSW). This was not a community
based sample and thus prone to selection bias. In order to appreciate the
results in full it would help to know how cases and controls were identified
and how controls were selected.
As bisexual or homosexual orientation may
be difficult to disclose even in a sympat...
Fether at al present a very interesting case control study on
STIs in women who have sex with women (WSW). This was not a community
based sample and thus prone to selection bias. In order to appreciate the
results in full it would help to know how cases and controls were identified
and how controls were selected.
As bisexual or homosexual orientation may
be difficult to disclose even in a sympathetic and non-judgemental
setting, studies using self-reported sexual orientation to determine
case or control status will always have a degree of differential
misclassification.
It is likely that WSW who volunteer this information
differ not only from women who do not have sex with women but also from
WSW who do not volunteer the information but admit it when prompted, and
from those who do not admit it even when prompted.
Without this information it is difficult to determine the importance of
various prevalence quoted in the paper. All I learn from this paper at
present is that women who have sex with women also take other risks.
I commend Shamanesh et al for their searching and informed
account of the impact of globalisation on the world AIDS problem.
Revisiting Alma Ata 1978: the existence of gross inequalities between
advantaged and disadvantaged peoples is "politically, socially and
economically" unacceptable.
22 years on, are we closer to the ideal of "health for all" or further
away. When will we learn?
In our area the high HIV prevalence has made the interpretation of syphilis tests paticularly problematic. Coinfected patients do appear to reactivate their treponemal infection or possibly reinfection with a different "strain" in the presence of profound immunosuppression. As with some other agents IgM can persist for several years with peaks and troughs! Non-treponemal tests are uniformly negative whilst...
Dear Editor
Fether at al present a very interesting case control study on STIs in women who have sex with women (WSW). This was not a community based sample and thus prone to selection bias. In order to appreciate the results in full it would help to know how cases and controls were identified and how controls were selected.
As bisexual or homosexual orientation may be difficult to disclose even in a sympat...
I commend Shamanesh et al for their searching and informed account of the impact of globalisation on the world AIDS problem. Revisiting Alma Ata 1978: the existence of gross inequalities between advantaged and disadvantaged peoples is "politically, socially and economically" unacceptable. 22 years on, are we closer to the ideal of "health for all" or further away. When will we learn?
Pages