@article {Ghanem97, author = {K G Ghanem and E J Erbelding and Z S Wiener and A M Rompalo}, title = {Serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics}, volume = {83}, number = {2}, pages = {97--101}, year = {2007}, doi = {10.1136/sti.2006.021402}, publisher = {The Medical Society for the Study of Venereal Disease}, abstract = {Background: HIV-positive patients treated for syphilis may be at increased risk for serological failure. Objective: To compare follow-up serologies and serological responses to treatment between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending two sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. Study design: Existing records were reviewed from HIV-positive patients who were diagnosed and treated for syphilis at the public STD clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, between 1992 and 2000. Results of their serological follow-up were compared with those of HIV-negative clinic patients at the time of syphilis treatment. Failure was defined as lack of a fourfold drop in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titre by 400 days after treatment or a fourfold increased titre between 30 and 400 days. Results: Of the 450 HIV-positive patients with syphilis, 288 (64\%) did not have documented follow-up serologies and 129 (28.5\%) met the inclusion criteria; 168 (17\%) of 1000 known HIV-negative patients were similarly eligible. There were 22 failures in the HIV-positive group and 5 in the HIV-negative group (p\<0.001). The median times to successful serological responses in both groups were 278 (95\% confidence interval (CI) 209 to 350) and 126 (95\% CI 108 to 157) days, respectively (p\<0.001). A multivariate Cox{\textquoteright}s proportional hazards model showed an increased risk of serological failure among the HIV-positive patients (hazards ratio 6.0, 95\% CI 1.5 to 23.9; pā€Š=ā€Š0.01). Conclusion: HIV-positive patients treated for syphilis may be at higher risk of serological failure. Despite recommendations for more frequent serological follow-up, most patients did not have documentation of serological response after standard treatment for syphilis.}, issn = {1368-4973}, URL = {https://sti.bmj.com/content/83/2/97}, eprint = {https://sti.bmj.com/content/83/2/97.full.pdf}, journal = {Sexually Transmitted Infections} }