PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Harding-Esch, E AU - Sherrard-Smith, E AU - Fuller, SS AU - Harb, A AU - Furegato, M AU - Mercer, C AU - Sadiq, ST AU - Howell-Jones, R AU - Nardone, A AU - White, PJ AU - Gates, P AU - Pearce, A AU - Keane, F AU - Colver, H AU - Nori, A AU - Dewsnap, C AU - Schatzberger, R AU - Estcourt, C AU - Dakshina, S AU - Lowndes, CM TI - P08.28 Patients continue to engage in risky sexual behaviour in the time period between being tested for chlamydia and receiving test result and treatment AID - 10.1136/sextrans-2015-052270.374 DP - 2015 Sep 01 TA - Sexually Transmitted Infections PG - A142--A143 VI - 91 IP - Suppl 2 4099 - http://sti.bmj.com/content/91/Suppl_2/A142.3.short 4100 - http://sti.bmj.com/content/91/Suppl_2/A142.3.full SO - Sex Transm Infect2015 Sep 01; 91 AB - Introduction There is a lack of data on the sexual behaviour of patients between being tested for chlamydia, receiving the test result, and being treated. This time-period may be important in the transmission of chlamydia, as infection could continue to be spread to sexual partners whilst awaiting the test result and treatment.We aimed to investigate the sexual behaviours of patients in this time-period in order to investigate the benefits a point-of-care test (POCT) might bring to clinical practice.Methods A cross-sectional clinical audit of Genito-Urinary Medicine (GUM) clinic attendees in England. Clinic staff conducted a notes review of patients returning for chlamydia treatment following a positive chlamydia test result, and of age- and sex-matched chlamydia negatives attending for initial consultation. Initial consultation data were available for all patients; data on behaviour between test and treatment were available only for chlamydia-positives. The data also served as a sexual history taking audit for the GUM clinics, following British Association of Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) guidelines.Results Five of nine GUM clinics approached participated (July–December 2014). The sexual history BASHH auditable outcomes completion rates varied from 0–100%. 775 patients (442 females, 353 males) were included in analyses. Males with 2–4 partners, and those who reported never using a condom, were more likely to be chlamydia positive. For 21/143 (14.7%) positive patients who provided data, last new sexual contact was in the period between test and treatment.Conclusion The BASHH 97% data recording target was only consistently met for one of six auditable outcomes, indicating required improvements in sexual history recording by GUM clinics.Patients continue to form new sexual partnerships whilst awaiting chlamydia test results, allowing for the possibility of infecting new sexual partners. POCTs which remove the test to treatment delay could prevent this onward transmission.