RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect access to condoms, chlamydia and HIV testing, and cervical cancer screening at a population level in Britain? (Natsal-COVID) JF Sexually Transmitted Infections JO Sex Transm Infect FD BMJ Publishing Group Ltd SP sextrans-2022-055516 DO 10.1136/sextrans-2022-055516 A1 Emily Dema A1 Pam Sonnenberg A1 Jo Gibbs A1 Anne Conolly A1 Malachi Willis A1 Julie Riddell A1 Raquel Bosó Pérez A1 Andrew J Copas A1 Clare Tanton A1 Chris Bonell A1 Clarissa Oeser A1 Soazig Clifton A1 Magnus Unemo A1 Catherine H Mercer A1 Kirstin R Mitchell A1 Nigel Field YR 2022 UL http://sti.bmj.com/content/early/2022/08/17/sextrans-2022-055516.abstract AB Objectives To investigate how differential access to key interventions to reduce STIs, HIV and their sequelae changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods British participants (18–59 years) completed a cross-sectional web survey 1 year (March–April 2021) after the initial lockdown in Britain. Quota-based sampling and weighting resulted in a quasi-representative population sample. We compared Natsal-COVID data with Natsal-3, a household-based probability sample cross-sectional survey (16–74 years) conducted in 2010–2012. Reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic and uptake of chlamydia testing/HIV testing/cervical cancer screening were analysed among sexually experienced participants (18–44 years) (n=3869, Natsal-COVID; n=8551, Natsal-3). ORs adjusted for age and other potential confounders describe associations with demographic and behavioural factors.Results In 2021, 6.9% of women and 16.2% of men reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic. This was more likely among participants: aged 18–24 years, of black or black British ethnicity, and reporting same-sex sex (past 5 years) or one or more new relationships (past year). Chlamydia and HIV testing were more commonly reported by younger participants, those reporting condomless sex with new sexual partners and men reporting same-sex partners; a very similar distribution to 10 years previously (Natsal-3). However, there were differences during the pandemic, including stronger associations with chlamydia testing for men reporting same-sex partners; with HIV testing for women reporting new sexual partners and with cervical screening among smokers.Conclusions Our study suggests differential access to key primary and secondary STI/HIV prevention interventions continued during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was not strong evidence that differential access has changed during the pandemic when compared with 2010–2012. While the pandemic might not have exacerbated inequalities in access to primary and secondary prevention, it is clear that large inequalities persisted, typically among those at greatest STI/HIV risk.Data are available in a public, open access repository. An anonymised dataset will be deposited with the UK Data Archive.