Table 3

Logistic regression analysis assessing the effect of stigma and shame on perceptions about disclosure of sexual behaviours*

Model 1‡Model 2§
Independent variable†OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
*Anticipate a negative reaction from disclosure v anticipate that it would not make a difference if disclosed sexual behaviours.
†Stigma (high=0, low=1); shame (high=0, low=1).
‡Adjusted for mode of interview (A-CASI v telephone).
§Adjusted for mode of interview (A-CASI v telephone) and other variable (stigma or shame) listed in table.
Males (n=63):
STD related stigma
    High0.433 (0.14 to 1.3)0.1350.347 (0.11 to 1.1)0.082
    Low
STD related shame
    High1.45 (0.49 to 4.3)0.5022.00 (0.60 to 6.6)0.259
    Low
Females (n=79):
STD related stigma
    High0.378 (0.15 to 0.95)0.0390.319 (0.12 to 0.85)0.023
    Low
STD related shame
    High1.35 (0.49 to 3.7)0.5611.94 (0.65 to 5.8)0.235
    Low