Table 1

Reasons why HSV type specific serology was requested

Reasons for testingMenWomenTotal
No (%)No (%)No (%)
χ2 = 15.62, df = 2, p = 0.08.
*23 men and 28 women also had genital lesions at the same time.
†Not included in the calculation of χ2.
‡Patient’s partner had HSV change on Papanicolaou smear.
Partner with known genital herpes*148 (29.5)115 (29.9)263 (29.7)
Undiagnosed recurrent genital ulceration or recurrent signs and symptoms suggestive of herpes137 (27.3)93 (24.2)230 (25.9)
First episode of genital ulceration or signs and symptoms suggestive of first episode genital herpes109 (21.7)84 (21.8)193 (21.6)
Routine screening79 (15.7)41 (10.7)120 (13.5)
HSV isolated without typing6 (1.2)14 (3.6)20 (2.3)
Seropositive (EIA) previous8 (1.6)11 (2.9)19 (2.1)
No reason6 (1.2)9 (2.3)15 (1.7)
Patient pregnant†012 (3.1)12 (1.4)
HSV isolated and check serological status4 (0.8)3 (0.8)7 (0.8)
HSV change on PAP smear†2‡ (0.4)2 (0.5)4 (0.5)
Patient’s wife pregnant†3 (0.6)03 (0.3)
Total502 (100)384 (100)886 (100)