Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of factors associated with hygiene before and after the most recent sexual partner
| Wash genitals before sex with most recent encounter OR (95% CI) | Wash genitals after sex with most recent encounter OR (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Bivariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |
| * (0.05>p<0.10); ** (p<0.05); †Lower risk (wife or girlfriend) v higher risk (casual partner or FSW). | ||||
| Age | 0.98 (0.95 to 1.0) | 0.96 (0.93 to 0.98)** | 0.97 (0.94 to 0.99)** | |
| Circumcision status | 0.7 (0.4 to 1.3) | 1.5 (0.9 to 2.4)* | ||
| Education (⩾ secondary) | 1.0 (0.6 to 1.8) | 1.1 (0.7 to 1.60) | ||
| Marital status | 0.95 (0.5 to 1.6) | 0.5 (0.3 to 0.75)** | ||
| Any v no children | 0.8 (0.5 to 1.4) | 0.5 (0.3 to 0.7)** | 0.6 (0.3 to 0.9)** | |
| Tribe: | ||||
| Luhya v Luo | 0.8 (0.3 to 1.9) | 1.1 (0.6 to 2.0) | ||
| Kikuyu v Luo | 1.0 (0.5 to 2.1) | 1.4 (0.8 to 2.4) | ||
| Kamba v Luo | 0.4 (0.1 to 1.6) | 0.9 (0.4 to 2.1) | ||
| Other v Luo | 0.4 (0.2 to 0.9)** | 0.3 (0.1 to 0.7)** | 1.7 (1.1 to 2.9)** | |
| Protestant v Catholic | 0.7 (0.4 to 1.4) | 0.8 (0.5 to 1.2) | ||
| Muslim v Catholic | 2.6 (0.6 to 10.4) | 1.9 (0.5 to 6.3) | ||
| Other v Catholic | 1.5 (0.7 to 3.3) | 0.8 (0.4 to 1.40) | ||
| Perception of HIV risk | 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)** | 0.4 (0.2 to 0.8)** | 0.7 (0.5 to 0.98)** | |
| Income in last month | 1.1 (0.6 to 1.9) | 1.1 (0.7 to 1.6) | 1.4 (0.9 to 2.2)* | |
| Years lived in Nairobi | 1.0 (0.98 to 1.0) | 0.98 (0.97 to 1.0)* | ||
| Total people in house | 1.0 (0.9 to 1.2) | 0.95 (0.9 to 1.0) | ||
| Flowing tap water in house | 1.4 (0.8 to 2.6) | 1.5 (0.95 to 2.2)* | ||
| Share bathroom with >10 others | 0.6 (0.3 to 1.0)* | 0.5 (0.3 to 0.9)** | 0.8 (0.6 to 1.2) | |
| Partner type† | 0.8 (0.4 to 1.6) | 1.0 (0.7 to 1.7) | ||
| Use condoms during sex | 1.2 (0.7 to 2.1) | 1.5 (1.01 to 2.2)** | ||