Table 2

 Projected impact over 4 years (1995–8) of the STI treatment aspect of the SIDA2 HIV prevention intervention, for its current method of syndromic diagnosis and if it had used POC tests

Diagnostic test used for Ng/CtFSW Ng/Ct screeningFSW clinic attenders treated for Ng/Ct at SIDA2 clinicTotal Ng/Ct averted [prevented fraction*]Total HIV averted [prevented fraction*]Infections averted per FSW treated at clinic
SensitivitySpecificityCorrectlyIncorrectlyMean(95% CI)Mean(95% CI)Ng/CtHIV
Numbers in parentheses are uncertainty bounds.
*Prevented fraction refers to the percentage of incident infections that are averted as a result of the STI treatment intervention
Syndromic algorithm48%75%1339 (1181–1709)1861 (1668–1966)18 553 [10%](16 871–20 447) (8% to 13%)359 [6%](220–464) (4% to 8%)5.8 (5.2–6.2)0.11 (0.07–0.14)
POC test60%95%1620 (1423–2081)377 (338–398)22 882 [13%](20 766–25 307) (10% to 16%)442 [8%](272–572) (5% to 10%)11.5 (10.2–12.4)0.22 (0.12–0.29)
POC test70%95%1840 (1610–2375)381 (342–402)26 395 [15%](23 913–29 278) (12% to 18%)509 [9%](314–660) (6% to 11%)11.9 (10.6–12.9)0.23 (0.13–0.31)
POC test80%95%2046 (1785–2655)384 (346–406)29 823 [17%](26 970–33 180) (13% to 20%)575 [10%](355–746) (6% to 12%)12.3 (10.9–13.3)0.24 (0.13–0.32)