Table 1

 Proportion of men reporting commercial sex in the last 12 months†

SurveyPrevalence (%) of clients of FSWUrban:rural ratio *p<0.05Source
†Defined as all men 15–49 years old who reported giving money, gifts, or favours in return for sex, in the last 12 months; except countries with * where definition is “paid sex”; + aged 20–49.
(1) Sample only includes respondents with a non-regular partner; (2) sample only includes ever married men; (3) of last three partners, at least one was a sex worker; (4) sample includes sexually active only and age group is 18–49, except Chile (20–69) Switzerland (18–45).
W Africa
    Benin 1996 DHS19.30.8DHS
    Benin 2001 DHS*0.51.1DHS
    Burkina Faso 1999 DHS9.11.0DHS
    Burkina Faso 2003 DHS*(3)0.219.7*DHS
    Côte d’Ivoire 1998 DHS5.01.0DHS
    Ghana 2003 DHS*1.60.6DHS
    Guinea 1999 DHS4.70.8DHS
    Guinea-Bissau 1990 GPA8.6GPA
    Mali 1996 DHS8.92.5*DHS
    Mali 2001 DHS*0.229.8*DHS
    Niger 1998 DHS9.71.2DHS
    Nigeria 1999 DHS9.71.1DHS
    Nigeria 2003 DHS*3.00.6DHS
    Togo 1998 DHS5.71.3DHS
    Median 1.1
Central Africa
    CAR 1989 GPA12.8GPA
    CAR 1994 DHS10.91.2DHS
    Cameroon 1998 DHS21.00.9DHS
    Cameroon 2004 DHS*0.73.4*DHS
    Chad 1997 DHS13.62.3*DHS
    Chad 2004 DHS*1.63.1*DHS
    Congo 1999 PSI14.8PSI
    Gabon 2000 DHS*9.81.0DHS
    Median 2.2
E Africa
    Eritrea 1995 DHS3.02.5DHS
    Ethiopia 2000 DHS*0.0DHS
    Kenya 1990 GPA9.8GPA
    Kenya 1998 DHS11.91.5*DHS
    Kenya 2003 DHS*2.91.9*DHS
    Rwanda 2000 DHS*0.87.2*DHS
    Tanzania 1990 GPA8.6GPA
    Tanzania 2004 DHS*1.51.3DHS
    Uganda 1995 DHS26.21.4*DHS
    Uganda 2000 DHS*1.51.5DHS
    Median 1.9
S Africa
    Botswana 2001 AIDS impact*(1)2.0AIDS impact
    Lesotho 1989 GPA14.9GPA
    Lesotho 2004 DHS*1.73.4DHS
    Malawi 1996 DHS7.81.0DHS
    Malawi 2000 DHS*8.31.3DHS
    Mozambique 2003 DHS*13.20.9DHS
    Namibia 2000 DHS*1.61.3DHS
    Zambia 1996 DHS22.90.9DHS
    Zambia 2002 DHS*10.61.2DHS
    Zimbabwe 1994 DHS5.41.1DHS
    Zimbabwe 1999 DHS*7.01.4DHS
    Median 1.3
S & SE Asia
    Nepal 2002 DHS*(2)0.40.6DHS
    Philippines 2003 DHS*2.11.9*DHS
    Singapore 1989 GPA7.6GPA
    Sri Lanka 1991 GPA1.2GPA
    Thailand 1990 GPA23.4GPA
    Median
Latin America & Caribbean
    Bolivia 2003 DHS*2.52.1*DHS
    Brazil 1996 DHS*(3)0.20.3DHS
    Chile 1998 NAT*(4)1.0NAT
    Dominican Republic 1996 DHS11.60.7*DHS
    Dominican Republic 2002 DHS*(3)8.00.7DHS
    Haiti 1994 DHS6.80.6*DHS
    Haiti 2000 DHS*5.90.6*DHS
    Honduras 1996 RHS*4.9RHS
    Peru 1996 DHS4.61.2DHS
    Median 0.7
E Europe & Central Asia
    Armenia 2000 DHS*2.43.4*DHS
    Kazakhstan 1999 DHS*1.40.7DHS
    Uzbekistan 2002 DHS*3.21.5DHS
    Median 1.5
High income countries
    Australia 2002 ASHR*1.8ASHR
    France 1992 NAT*(4)1.1NAT
    France 1998 NEM*0.71.2NEM
    Germany 1990 NAT*West (4)4.8NAT
    Germany 1998 NEM*0.0NEM
    Greece 1998 NEM*5.30.4NEM
    Italy 1992 NAT*(4)2.0NAT
    Italy 1998 NEM*1.7NEM
    Netherlands 1989 NAT*(4)2.8NAT
    Norway 1992 NAT*(4)1.8NAT
    Norway 1997 NEM*1.7NEM
    Portugal 1991 NAT*(4)5.4NAT
    Portugal 1999 NEM*2.4NEM
    Spain 1990 NAT*(4)11.0NAT
    Switzerland 1992 NAT*(4)3.7NAT
    Switzerland 1997 NEM*3.4NEM
    UK 1990 NAT*2.0NAT
    UK 1998 NEM*1.0NEM
    Median
City based surveys
    Athens, Greece, 19906.0NAT
    Cotonou*, Benin, 19986.5Multisite
    Dakar*, Senegal, 19974.5Multisite
    Kisumu*, Kenya, 19988.7Multisite
    Ndola*, Zambia, 199814.0Multisite
    Yaounde*, Cameroon, 199815.5Multisite
    Ouagadougou*,Burkina, 200212.2Multisite
    Manila, Philippines, 19905.8GPA
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 19916.5GPA