Table 2

Summary of characteristics of economic evaluations of partner notification for chlamydia infection, in chronological order

First author, year,  >reference	Partner notification strategy			Outcome		Model		Target population			Cost effectiveness, screening recommended
First author, year,  >reference	M partners   >of F	F partners   >of M	Either	MOA	Short   >term	Static	TDM	F	M&F	M	Yes	No	Comments
*Study also included in table 1.
MOA, major outcome averted; TDM, transmission dynamic model; M, males; F, females; PN, partner notification.
Postma, 2001¹⁴*	√			√		√		√			√		PN improves cost effectiveness by 50%
Howell, 1997⁴⁴			√		√	√			√		√		PN more cost effective for female partners of male cases than male partners of female cases
Katz, 1988⁴³			√		√	None			√				Field follow up by trained investigators most cost effective