Table 1 Distribution of reported numbers of heterosexual (opposite sex) partners (lifetime, past 5 years and past year) for men and women by age at interview (birth cohort): SLAHS 2000, Slovenia
No of partnersMenAllWomenAll
Age in years (birth cohort)Age in years (birth cohort)
18–24 (1975–82)25–34 (1965–74)35–49 (1950–64)18–24 (1975–82)25–34 (1965–74)35–49 (1950–64)
Lifetime
    015.3%3.0%1.0%4.9%14.6%1.4%0.2%3.7%
    116.5%13.6%16.5%15.6%31.1%33.4%44.9%38.5%
    29.6%8.9%10.3%9.7%16.2%18.1%14.3%15.9%
    3–421.8%22.3%19.7%21.0%20.1%23.4%20.5%21.3%
    5–917.5%24.6%20.8%21.2%13.0%18.9%13.3%15.2%
    10+19.4%27.7%31.8%27.7%5.1%4.8%6.3%5.6%
Mean* (SD)6.5 (14.3)7.9 (11.6)9.5 (13.0)8.3 (12.9)2.9 (3.9)3.4 (3.5)3.1 (3.6)3.2 (3.6)
Median (99th percentile)3 (45)5 (58)5 (60)4 (58)2 (22)2 (15)2 (20)2 (20)
    Bases WT (UWT)193 (323)250 (186)394 (303)837 (812)181 (313)255 (214)408 (352)844 (879)
Past 5 years
    015.9%4.8%3.0%6.5%14.7%2.8%2.6%5.2%
    118.4%52.7%68.9%52.6%33.8%76.0%89.3%73.5%
    210.4%10.1%8.4%9.4%19.7%9.7%5.6%9.8%
    3–423.4%13.1%9.9%14.0%17.4%7.0%2.6%7.0%
    5–917.9%12.6%5.6%10.5%10.5%4.5%0.0%3.6%
    10+13.6%6.6%4.2%7.2%3.9%0.0%0.0%0.8%
Mean* (SD)5.5 (13.3)3.1 (4.7)2.1 (3.1)3.2 (7.3)2.5 (3.4)1.4 (1.1)1.1 (0.5)1.5 (1.8)
Median (99th percentile)3 (40)1 (30)1 (15)1 (30)2 (16)1 (5)1 (4)1 (8)
    Bases WT (UWT)193 (322)249 (186)400 (307)842 (815)180 (311)258 (216)414 (357)851 (884)
Past year
    023.3%9.3%4.4%10.2%19.7%5.3%5.9%8.6%
    144.5%70.2%78.1%68.1%61.2%89.8%92.0%84.8%
    212.1%10.9%11.3%11.3%11.9%4.1%1.5%4.5%
    3–412.9%7.3%5.6%7.8%5.1%0.9%0.6%1.7%
    5–95.8%1.8%0.3%2.0%2.2%0.0%0.0%0.5%
    10+1.5%0.5%0.3%0.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Mean* (SD)1.8 (3.7)1.3 (1.3)1.2 (0.8)1.4 (2.0)1.1 (1.0)1.0 (0.4)1.0 (0.3)1.0 (0.6)
Median (99th percentile)1 (10)1 (7)1 (4)1 (8)1 (5)1 (2)1 (2)1 (3)
    Bases WT (UWT)192 (321)248 (185)399 (306)840 (812)182 (315)259 (217)414 (357)855 (889)
  • SLAHS, Sexual Lifestyles, Attitudes and Health Survey; UWT, unweighted counts of individuals; WT, weighted counts of individuals. *Mean is not the most appropriate summary measure as the distribution is skewed. Numbers of individuals (bases) included in analyses vary according to the number of missing values for individual variables.