Strength of evidence | Conclusions | |
Modelling of HIV incidence and prevalence | Moderately strong for timing |
|
| ||
Reports of behaviour change in newspaper articles | Strong for timing; very weak for representativeness |
|
| ||
DHS and GPA surveys with questions about personal behaviour change | Strong for representativeness; weak for validity |
|
| ||
DHS survey data | Very strong for representativeness |
|
| ||
| ||
GPA survey data | Moderately strong for representativeness |
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
Other surveys of sexual behaviour | Weak for representativeness |
|
| ||
| ||
| ||
Reports of shipments of condoms to Uganda | Strong for timing; strong for validity of receipt; weak for actual condom use |
|
| ||
| ||
Historical documents describing programmatic efforts to address AIDS | Strong for timing; strong for validity |
|
|
DHS, Demographic and Health Survey; GPA, the World Health Organization’s Global Program on AIDS.