Univariate and multivariate analyses of programme exposure and intermediate causal characteristics among FSW at follow-up compared with baseline
| Programme exposure | Baseline % (n=2312) | Follow-up % (n=2400) | Crude OR (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | p Value (Wald test) adjusted OR |
| Ever visited by a peer educator | 82.8 | 95.3 | 4.25 (2.81 to 6.43) | 4.35 (3.14 to 6.01) | <0.001 |
| Ever visited the drop-in centre | 32.2 | 76.6 | 6.88 (4.79 to 9.87) | 8.72 (7.01 to 10.84) | <0.001 |
| Ever visited the project sexual health clinic | 68.4 | 85.1 | 2.63 (2.00 to 3.45) | 2.77 (2.14 to 3.59) | <0.001 |
| Ever received ‘grey pack’ | 58.4 | 63.6 | 1.24 (1.00 to 1.55) | 1.28 (0.98 to 1.67) | 0.07 |
| Ever witnessed a condom demonstration | 73.3 | 89.0 | 2.93 (1.87 to 4.58) | 2.97 (2.14 to 4.13) | <0.001 |
| Condom breakage in the past month | 17.0 | 14.1 | 0.80 (0.58 to 1.11) | 0.75 (0.60 to 0.92) | 0.007 |
Multivariate models were adjusted for the following variables: district, age, marital status, residency status, usual place of solicitation, age started sex work, charge per sex act, weekly sex work income, proportion of clients who were new and proportion of female sex workers (FSW) with regular partners.