Adjusted proportions* from logistic regression analyses of behavioural outcomes related to condom use among men who have had commercial sex in the last 12 months, by survey round and geographic location (statistical difference shown between baseline and endline)
| Baseline Apr 2006 | Round 2 Dec 2006 | Round 3 May 2007 | Round 4 Feb 2008 | Endline Nov 2008 | Base vs end† | |
| All areas combined (n) | (2401) | (1756) | (1741) | (1779) | (2382) | |
| Consistent condom use with FSW in last 12 months (composite of 3 items below) | 63.6 | 70.9 | 81.4 | 81.9 | 86.5 | ** |
| Used condom last time sex with FSW | 89.9 | 91.6 | 92.2 | 94.5 | 95.3 | ** |
| Used condom with FSW every time in past 12 months | 72.6 | 75.2 | 83.3 | 83.1 | 88.4 | ** |
| No occasion when condom not used with FSW in past 12 months | 63.6 | 70.9 | 81.4 | 81.9 | 86.5 | ** |
| Andhra Pradesh (n) | (480) | (354) | (351) | (357) | (447) | |
| Consistent condom use with FSW in last 12 months (composite of 3 items below) | 63.8 | 64.9 | 79.3 | 82.6 | 76.1 | * |
| Used condom last time sex with FSW | 93.9 | 90.9 | 93.8 | 95.2 | 92.1 | ns |
| Used condom with FSW every time in past 12 months | 71.7 | 70.2 | 81.6 | 83.9 | 78.7 | ns |
| No occasion when condom not used with FSW in past 12 months | 63.8 | 64.9 | 79.3 | 82.6 | 76.1 | * |
| Karnataka (n) | (481) | (337) | (351) | (350) | (473) | |
| Consistent condom use with FSW in last 12 months (composite of 3 items below) | 51.0 | 66.0 | 70.5 | 69.0 | 81.1 | ** |
| Used condom last time sex with FSW | 88.5 | 84.6 | 81.4 | 89.9 | 90.6 | ns |
| Used condom with FSW every time in past 12 months | 62.8 | 66.2 | 70.3 | 68.8 | 84.8 | ** |
| No occasion when condom not used with FSW in past 12 months | 51.0 | 66.0 | 70.5 | 69.0 | 81.1 | ** |
| Tamil Nadu (n) | (480) | (352) | (344) | (357) | (473) | |
| Consistent condom use with FSW in last 12 months (composite of 3 items below) | 40.1 | 55.0 | 67.6 | 70.1 | 79.3 | ** |
| Used condom last time sex with FSW | 71.4 | 82.6 | 83.0 | 86.5 | 93.2 | ** |
| Used condom with FSW every time in past 12 months | 49.7 | 56.9 | 68.7 | 70.4 | 80.4 | ** |
| No occasion when condom not used with FSW in past 12 months | 40.1 | 55.0 | 67.6 | 70.1 | 79.3 | ** |
| Maharashtra (except Mumbai) (n) | (480) | (336) | (325) | (355) | (498) | |
| Consistent condom use with FSW in last 12 months (composite of 3 items below) | 84.2 | 86.2 | 97.9 | 93.6 | 95.7 | ** |
| Used condom last time sex with FSW | 97.0 | 98.3 | 99.8 | 99.3 | 99.5 | * |
| Used condom with FSW every time in past 12 months | 90.2 | 92.5 | 98.4 | 94.5 | 96.0 | * |
| No occasion when condom not used with FSW in past 12 months | 84.2 | 86.2 | 97.9 | 93.6 | 95.7 | ** |
| Mumbai (n) | (480) | (377) | (370) | (360) | (491) | |
| Consistent condom use with FSW in last 12 months (composite of 3 items below) | 70.8 | 76.5 | 81.4 | 83.3 | 94.1 | ** |
| Used condom last time sex with FSW | 90.0 | 95.9 | 94.6 | 94.8 | 97.5 | * |
| Used condom with FSW every time in past 12 months | 77.3 | 81.6 | 85.3 | 84.7 | 95.5 | ** |
| No occasion when condom not used with FSW in past 12 months | 70.8 | 76.5 | 81.4 | 83.3 | 94.1 | ** |
↵* Logistic regression models are adjusted for variables found to vary significantly over time at bivariate level: age, state where the study was conducted (for combined sample only), mobility, living in regional capital, duration of residence in city, marital status, socio-economic status, living arrangement, consumption of alcohol, other sexual partners in past 12 months (any other non-spousal non-commercial female partners), place where female sex workers (FSWs) are usually met, has seen condom advertisements other than those for PSI/Avahan-promoted ‘Masti’ condoms in past 6 months.
↵† *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ns, not significant.