Retrospective consistent condom use trends and linear time-trend analysis by district
Proportion of sex workers consistently using condoms: reconstructed rates and data from year of survey | GEE analysis of reconstructed rates: slope—linear time trend (percentage increase per year) | |||||||
District | State | Year of survey | 2001 (%) | 2003 (%) | Survey data (%) | Overall (2001—survey) (%) | Pre- (2001–2003) (%) | Post- (2003—survey) (%) |
Occasional clients | ||||||||
Belgaum | KA | 2008 | 32.5 | 48.5 | 89.1 | 9.3* | 8.0* | 7.5* |
Bellary | KA | 2008 | 12.3 | 38.8 | 89.1 | 12.5* | 13.3* | 10.7* |
Chennai | TN | 2006 | 10.5 | 31.1 | 91.1 | 17.5* | 10.3* | 21.5* |
Chitoor | AP | 2006 | 0.0 | 6.6 | 36.1 | 6.9* | 3.3* | 9.7* |
Coimbatore | TN | 2006 | 3.4 | 3.9 | 40.9 | 7.5* | 0.3 | 12.6* |
Dharmapuri | TN | 2006 | 2.6 | 9.7 | 68.8 | 15.2* | 3.6* | 19.9* |
East Godavari | AP | 2006 | 8.6 | 29.9 | 82.0 | 15.8* | 10.7* | 17.1* |
Guntur | AP | 2006 | 0.8 | 10.1 | 86.6 | 17.4* | 4.7* | 26.4* |
Madurai | TN | 2006 | 10.2 | 18.0 | 71.0 | 12.4* | 3.9* | 17.5* |
Mumbai BB† | MH | 2006 | 60.7 | 66.4 | 78.5 | 2.8* | 2.9* | 3.8* |
Mumbai NBB‡ | MH | 2006 | 54.7 | 59.8 | 72.1 | 3.4* | 2.6 | 3.9* |
Mysore | KA | 2007 | 11.5 | 18.3 | 67.2 | 9.3* | 3.4* | 11.7* |
Prakasam | AP | 2006 | 0.0 | 4.1 | 40.0 | 7.1* | 2.1* | 11.5* |
Pune BB† | MH | 2006 | 78.6 | 90.7 | 96.3 | 3.5* | 6.1* | 1.9* |
Pune NBB‡ | MH | 2006 | 70.9 | 77.5 | 87.3 | 3.4* | 3.3* | 3.3* |
Salem | TN | 2006 | 7.7 | 19.8 | 78.8 | 14.7* | 6.1* | 18.6* |
Shimoga | KA | 2008 | 11.4 | 29.9 | 83.8 | 11.4* | 9.3* | 11.5* |
Thane BB† | MH | 2006 | 80.8 | 92.9 | 98.7 | 3.1* | 6.1* | 1.8* |
Thane NBB‡ | MH | 2006 | 81.3 | 91.6 | 97.5 | 2.9* | 5.3* | 1.6* |
Visakhapatnam | AP | 2006 | 2.1 | 15.2 | 89.1 | 18.5* | 6.6* | 25.3* |
Yevatmal | MH | 2006 | 29.3 | 55.2 | 97.3 | 13.9* | 13.0* | 13.5* |
Regular clients | ||||||||
Belgaum | KA | 2008 | 22.2 | 36.7 | 78.9 | 9.5* | 7.3* | 7.9* |
Bellary | KA | 2008 | 8.3 | 30.9 | 84.1 | 12.3* | 11.3* | 11.1* |
Chennai | TN | 2006 | 16.6 | 35.5 | 90.8 | 16.2* | 9.5* | 19.9* |
Chitoor | AP | 2006 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14.9 | 2.6* | 0.0 | 5.0* |
Coimbatore | TN | 2006 | 2.9 | 7.8 | 42.4 | 8.3* | 2.5* | 11.7* |
Dharmapuri | TN | 2006 | 2.5 | 10.3 | 67.1 | 15.0* | 3.9* | 19.3* |
East Godavari | AP | 2006 | 8.2 | 29.2 | 76.0 | 14.3* | 10.5* | 15.7* |
Guntur | AP | 2006 | 0.7 | 9.6 | 85.1 | 16.8* | 4.5* | 25.9* |
Madurai | TN | 2006 | 10.3 | 14.6 | 64.2 | 11.4* | 2.1* | 16.5* |
Mumbai BB† | MH | 2006 | 57.1 | 63.7 | 74.8 | 3.2* | 3.3* | 3.5* |
Mumbai NBB‡ | MH | 2006 | 40.9 | 43.7 | 55.9 | 2.9* | 1.4 | 4.0* |
Mysore | KA | 2007 | 15.9 | 18.7 | 56.2 | 6.6* | 1.4 | 8.9* |
Prakasam | AP | 2006 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 17.2 | 2.5* | −0.2 | 5.2* |
Pune BB† | MH | 2006 | 53.6 | 81.2 | 95.4 | 7.6* | 13.8* | 4.6* |
Pune NBB‡ | MH | 2006 | 57.0 | 67.2 | 84.4 | 5.3* | 5.1* | 5.5* |
Salem | TN | 2006 | 7.1 | 20.4 | 66.2 | 12.2* | 6.7* | 14.6* |
Shimoga | KA | 2008 | 7.8 | 22.5 | 76.8 | 10.9* | 7.3* | 11.3* |
Thane BB† | MH | 2006 | 74.3 | 88.9 | 96.6 | 3.9* | 7.3* | 2.6* |
Thane NBB‡ | MH | 2006 | 74.8 | 82.9 | 91.7 | 2.8* | 4.1 | 2.9* |
Visakhapatnam | AP | 2006 | 1.6 | 14.1 | 80.9 | 17.4* | 6.2* | 22.5* |
Yevatmal | MH | 2006 | 43.3 | 55.1 | 88.7 | 9.7* | 5.9* | 11.0* |