Table 1

Demographic, behavioural and biological parameters for the model to assess cost effectiveness of FSW targeted interventions in India

ParameterBase valueRangeSource (see Reference list)
LowerUpper
Intervention parameters
 Efficacy of condom use35–37
  Vaginal0.80.750.85
  Anal0.70.650.75
  Oral0.90.850.95
 Annual increase in condom use among FSW0.0910.0730.09921
  Enrolment of FSW in targeted intervention projects (1995)0.022
  Enrolment of FSW in targeted intervention projects (2008)0.5338
  Coverage of enrolled FSW for STI treatment (1995)0.2622
 Effectiveness of STI treatment0.850.680.9839
 Annual decline in risk behaviour20 21 32
  N (FSW)0.02
  M (FSW)0.03
Behavioural parameters
 Proportion of female population involved in commercial sex0.00560.0390.00621
 Proportion of male population
  15–50 years sexually active0.1050.090.1221
  15–50 years having non-regular partner who reported commercial sex in 1 year0.0340.0260.042
 Type of FSW-client sex acts40 41
  Vaginal0.90.850.992
  Anal0.050.0030.08
  Oral0.0500110.1
 Proportion condom use (1995)
FSW0.230.190.3214
  Married GP0.0220.0090.0630 33 34
  Unmarried GP0.0140.010.018
  Annual change in condom use among married GP0.090.050.1430 34
 Mean sex acts per FSW per client per year32.253.75Calculation based on IBBA, BSS-1, 2
 Mean no of client per FSW per year (1995)205179226Calculation based on IBBA, Dandona et al29
 Mean sex acts per client per FSW per year (1995)2.812.53.0Calculation based on IBBA, Dandona et al29
 Mean no of FSW per client per year16Calculation based on IBBA, BSS-1, 2
 Mean sex acts per partner per married GP per year4542
 Mean sex acts per partner per unmarried GP per year1043
 Mean no. of partners per married GP per year1.01931
 Mean no. of partners per unmarried GP per year0.04631
 Proportion of GP married-client sex act type31
  Vaginal0.89
  Anal0.009
  Oral0.094
 Proportion of GP unmarried-client sex act type31
  Vaginal0.89
  Anal0.009
  Oral0.094
Biological parameters
 Proportion of FSW with44 45
  HIV0.0970.050.4645
  STI0.420.350.4746
 Odds for STI among HIV infected0.8
 Proportion of adolescent females with STI0.0410.0040.16231
 Proportion of clients with
 HIV0.047Author analysis using HSS data
 STI0.2621
 Odds for STI among HIV infected0.846
 Probability of HIV transmission:Range according to authors' estimates25 27
  Male to female
   Vaginal0.00140.00070.0021
   Anal0.010.0050.015
   Oral0.00040.00020.0005
  Female to male
   Vaginal0.00070.000350.0015
   Anal0.0010.00050.0015
 STI cofactor multiplicative effect32525 28
 Probability of STI transmission:0.347–50
  Male to female0.15
   Vaginal0.250.20.5
   Anal0.40.30.5
   Oral0.10.050.15
  Female to male
   Vaginal0.25
   Anal0.4
 Proportion of female population (15–45 years) with
  HIV0.0020.20.3Author analysis based on HSS data44
  STI0.20.30.5
Cost parameters
 Total NACP budget1
  NACP-1 (1995–6)80 crore
  NACP-21425 crore
  NACP-311583 crore
 Proportion of budget to mass media1
 No FSW intervention scenario
  NACP-1 (1995–6)0.45
  NACP-20.25
  NACP-30.25
 FSW intervention scenario
  NACP-1 (1995–6)0.45
  NACP-20.25
  NACP-30.1
 Average cost per FSW enrolled under targeted intervention2 11 12 29 51–54(Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and KHPT. Personal communication, 2010 and NACO. Personal communication, 2009)
  NACP-17947731606
  NACP-2120816123419
  NACP-32559
 Average cost per beneficiary for ART treatment55
  199515 168
  20089806
 Coverage of ART treatment55 56
  19950.01
  20080.34
  • ART, antiretroviral therapy; BSS, behavioural sentinel surveillance; FSW, female sex worker; GP, general population; HSS, HIV sentinel surveillance; IBBA, integrated biological and behavioural surveillance; KHPT, Karnataka Health Promotion Trust; M (FSW) is the mean number of clients per FSW; N (FSW) is the mean sex acts per client per FSW per year; NACO, National AIDS Control Organization; NACP, National AIDS Control Programme; SRS, sample registration survey; STI, sexually transmitted infection.