Comparison of primary with early latent infection: estimates and CIs for multinomial regression modelling*
Parameter | Estimate | SE (95% CI) | p Value |
Intercept | −12.36 | 142.88 (−292.66 to 267.93) | 0.466 |
Strategic Health Authority | |||
East Midlands (baseline*) | |||
East of England | 12.49 | 306.01 (−587.83 to 612.82) | 0.484 |
London | 0.04 | 1.13 (−2.18 to 2.26) | 0.486 |
North West | 0.65 | 1.04 (−1.38 to 2.68) | 0.266 |
South Central | 10.99 | 215.44 (−411.65 to 466.64) | 0.480 |
South East Coast | −0.20 | 1.27 (−2.69 to 2.29) | 0.437 |
South West | 0.62 | 1.12 (−1.58 to 2.81) | 0.291 |
West Midlands | 0.26 | 1.18 (−2.05 to 2.56) | 0.413 |
Yorkshire & The Humber | 10.68 | 290.09 (−558.41 to 579.76) | 0.485 |
Gender | |||
Male (baseline*) | |||
Female | 0.85 | 1.29 (−1.68 to 3.37) | 0.255 |
Whether born in the UK | |||
UK born (baseline*) | |||
Non-UK born | 0.56 | 0.37 (−0.16 to 1.29) | 0.064 |
Ethnicity | |||
White | |||
Black | −0.06 | 0.94 (−1.92 to 1.79) | 0.473 |
Asian | −1.20 | 0.68 (−2.53 to 0.14) | 0.039 |
Other ethnicity | 0.02 | 0.92 (−1.79 to 1.82) | 0.493 |
Sexual orientation | |||
Heterosexual (baseline*) | |||
Men who have sex with men | 0.31 | 0.66 (−0.97 to 1.60) | 0.317 |
Reason for attending clinical services | |||
Routine STI screen (baseline*) | |||
Symptoms | 2.34 | 0.31 (1.74 to 2.94) | <0.001 |
Campaign | 0.26 | 1.56 (−2.79 to 3.31) | 0.433 |
Partner notification | 0.77 | 0.47 (−0.15 to 1.70) | 0.051 |
Antenatal screening | −14.78 | 717.42 (−1422.19 to 1392.64) | 0.492 |
Other | −0.32 | 0.42 (−1.14 to 0.50) | 0.224 |
HIV serostatus | |||
HIV negative (baseline*) | |||
HIV positive | 0.48 | 0.30 (−0.10 to 1.06) | 0.052 |
Infection acquired through oral sex | |||
No (baseline*) | |||
Yes | 0.12 | 0.29 (−0.46 to 0.69) | 0.346 |
Partner notification† | |||
Traceable | −0.01 | 0.04 (−0.08 to 0.06) | 0.399 |
Untraceable | −0.02 | 0.01 (−0.03 to 0.00) | 0.029 |
Location | |||
London (baseline*) | |||
Brighton | −0.76 | 0.75 (−2.23 to 0.70) | 0.153 |
Manchester | −0.97 | 0.56 (−2.08 to 0.14) | 0.043 |
Elsewhere UK | 0.36 | 0.56 (−0.74 to 1.46) | 0.259 |
Overseas | −0.55 | 0.50 (−1.52 to 0.42) | 0.134 |
Commercial sex worker | |||
No (baseline*) | |||
Yes | 0.32 | 0.76 (−1.17 to 1.80) | 0.337 |
Social network | |||
None (baseline*) | |||
Sauna | −0.95 | 0.31 (−1.56 to −0.34) | 0.001 |
Bar | −1.02 | 0.30 (−1.61 to −0.44) | <0.001 |
Internet | −1.01 | 0.31 (−1.61 to −0.41) | 0.001 |
Age | |||
16–19 (baseline*) | |||
20–24 | −1.24 | 1.23 (−3.66 to 1.17) | 0.157 |
25–34 | −1.15 | 1.21 (−3.52 to 1.23) | 0.172 |
35–44 | −0.92 | 1.23 (−3.32 to 1.49) | 0.227 |
45+ | −1.02 | 1.23 (−3.44 to 1.40) | 0.204 |
Time | |||
Year | 0.01 | 0.07 (−0.13 to 0.15) | 0.462 |
Interpretation: each estimated regression coefficient provides a measure of increased (if positive) or decreased (if negative) likelihood of presenting with primary, relative to early latent infection. For example, an HIV-positive individual would be expected to have a 1.62=exp{0.48} higher OR of presenting with primary syphilis infection (as opposed to early latent) compared with an HIV-negative patient.
↵* Baseline individual: white heterosexual, UK-born HIV-negative male, aged 16–19, who attended genitourinary medicine services in the East Midlands for a routine STI screen, likely to have acquired syphilis in London, but unlikely to have acquired infection through oral sex, not a commercial sex worker and with no stated social/sexual networks.
↵† No baseline is shown for partner notification because it is a discrete variable.
STI, sexually transmitted infection.