Table 2

Summary of immunochromatographic strip studies (n=3)

First author, year, referenceCountryStudy populationSymptomatic (%)SexSample size (n)POC test brand nameGold standardGonorrhoea prevalence (%)Specimen typeSensitivity %
(95% CI)
Specificity %
(95% CI)
PPV %
(95% CI)
NPV %
(95% CI)
Alary, 200613BeninSex worker5.4F1084GC CheckNAAT
Amplicor CT/NG (Roche, location not specified)
4.6Cervical swab

Vaginal
swab
70
(55 to 82)

54
(37 to 71)
97
(96 to 98)

98
(9&  to 99)
55
(50 to 76)*

61
(42 to 76)
98.7
(98 to 99)*

97.7
(96 to 98)*
Benzaken, 20063BrazilSTI clinic attendeesHigh risk†F326BiostarCulture
Modified Thayer–Martin
15.0Cervical Swab60
(46 to 74)
89
(86 to 94)
56
(42 to 69)
92.6
(89.5 to 95.7)
Suzuki, 200426JapanUrology department100M58NOW Gonorrhoea TestCulture
Thayer–Martin
58.6Urine94
(80 to 99)*
96
(79 to 100)*
97*
(84 to 100)*
92
(75 to 98)
  • *Calculated by author.

  • †Referred by sexual partner or symptomatic.

  • GUM, genitourinary medicine; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; NPV, negative predictive value; POC, point-of-care; PPV, positive predictive value; STI, sexually transmitted infection.