Table 4

Rates of CT and CT and/or GC (CT/GC) infection detected in (a) all women assessed (whole cross-sectional study group) (n=3804) and (b) the PID cases. (n=169) (c) Rates of PID diagnoses among women subsequently testing positive for CT and CT /GC (n=3804)

Experience level of clinicians (number of clinicians)Whole study (n=36)All inexperienced (n=17)All experienced (n=19)Consultants (n=6)All experienced versus all inexperiencedConsultants versus all inexperienced
OR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)p Value
(a) Detection rate of infection in all women
 CT % (n)10.5 (398)9.0 (71)10.8 (327)11.4 (106)1.23 (0.93 to 1.61)0.141.30 (0.94 to 1.81)0.10
 CT/GC % (n)11.8 (441)9.9 (79)12.0 (362)12.6 (117)1.24 (0.95 to 1.60)0.111.29 (0.95 to 1.77)0.10
(b) Detection rate of infection in PID cases
 CT % (n)23.7 (40)8.8 (3)27.4 (37)31.9 (15)3.90 (1.12 to 13.53)0.024.84 (1.15 to 23.51)0.01
 CT/GC % (n)27.8 (47)11.8 (4)31.9 (43)34.1 (16)3.51 (1.16 to 10.58)0.023.87 (1.04 to 15.61)0.02
(c) PID diagnostic rate in women subsequently found to have an infection
 CT % (n)10.1 (40)4.2 (3)11.3 (37)14.2 (15)2.89 (0.87 to 9.66)0.073.74 (1.04 to 13.42)0.03
 CT/GC % (n)10.7 (47)5.1 (4)11.9 (43)13.7 (16)2.53 (0.88 to 7.26)0.082.70 (0.80 to 9.99)0.08
  • All P values obtained using χ2.

  • CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; GC, gonococcal infection; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease.