Effect sizes for UAI by offline comparison venue
| Full samples | ||
|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | Weight (%) | |
| UAI (internet partner ref. bathhouse, sauna, sex resort partner) | ||
| Chiasson et al38 | 1.34 (0.94 to 1.90) | 4.9 |
| Grov et al14 | 1.60 (1.39 to 1.84) | 30.1 |
| NHBS II40 | 1.69 (1.53 to 1.86) | 65.0 |
| Model summary | 1.64 (1.52 to 1.78) I2<1%; Q2=1.8 (p=0.4) | |
| UAI (internet partner ref. bar, dance club partner) | ||
| Chiasson et al38 | 0.92 (0.66 to 1.29) | 11.8 |
| Grov et al14 | 1.40 (1.22 to 1.61) | 23.0 |
| NHBS I39 | 1.12 (0.80 to 1.56) | 11.9 |
| NHBS II40 | 0.99 (0.90 to 1.08) | 25.9 |
| SILAS IV | 1.22 (1.15 to 1.33) | 27.5 |
| Model summary | 1.14 (0.98 to 1.33) I2=84%; Q4=23.0 (p=0.0001) | |
NHBS, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance; UAI, unprotected anal intercourse.