Seroadaptive and conventional risk reduction strategies (n, %) among HIV-negative men* stratified by HIV testing history†, San Francisco, 2011
| Tested in last six months, N=179 | Did not test in last six months, N=171 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | p Value | |
| Seroadaptive and other harm reduction behaviours | 0.001 | ||||
| No sex | 14 | 7.8 | 40 | 23.4 | |
| No anal sex | 4 | 2.2 | 6 | 3.5 | |
| 100% condom | 66 | 36.9 | 46 | 26.9 | |
| Pure serosorting | 55 | 30.7 | 55 | 32.2 | |
| Condom serosorting | 16 | 8.9 | 12 | 7.0 | |
| Seropositioning | 17 | 9.5 | 9 | 5.3 | |
| No strategy | 7 | 3.9 | 3 | 1.8 | |
| Behaviour categories‡ | 0.254 | ||||
| Conventional risk reduction (no UAI) | 84 | 46.9 | 92 | 53.8 | |
| Any seroadaptive behaviour | 88 | 49.2 | 76 | 44.4 | |
*HIV serostatus based on self-reported result of most recent HIV test.
†Excludes seven HIV-negative men with missing data on date of last HIV test.
‡Behavioural category p value compares the frequency of behaviour categories (ie, conventional risk reduction behaviours vs seroadaptive behaviours vs no strategy) rather than specific strategies).
UAI, unprotected anal intercourse.