Table 3

Unadjusted associations of selected participant characteristics with prevalent and incident concurrencies among 536 participants enrolled in the Project on Partner Dynamics, Los Angeles, California, USA, 2006–2009

CharacteristicPrevalent concurrencyIncident concurrency
Prevalence (%)†PR95% CIIncidence (%)†RR95% CI
Birth sex
 Female17.1Ref9.5Ref
 Male35.22.11.6 to 2.7**16.51.71.2 to 2.6**
Age (years)
 18–2427.0Ref14.2Ref
 25–3023.20.90.7 to 1.19.20.60.4 to 1.0
Race/ethnicity
 White, non-Hispanic24.6Ref12.7Ref
 Black, non-Hispanic25.21.00.7 to 1.511.10.90.5 to 1.5
 Hispanic/Latino28.11.10.8 to 1.615.71.20.8 to 2.0
 Other23.41.00.6 to 1.57.00.60.3 to 1.2
Age at sexual debut (years)
 ≤1531.31.41.1 to 1.8**15.61.51.0 to 2.2
 >1522.4Ref10.7Ref
Number of sex partners, lifetime
 1–515.2Ref8.0Ref
 6–1020.11.30.9 to 2.012.61.60.9 to 2.7
 >1036.02.41.6 to3.4**14.81.91.1 to 3.0*
Alcohol or other drug use with 1+partners, 0–4 months ago
 Yes31.42.01.5 to 2.6**16.32.31.4 to 3.6**
 No15.9Ref7.2Ref
Alcohol or other drug use with 1+partners, 4–8 months ago
 Yes27.91.51.1 to 2.0**12.41.20.8 to 1.9
 No18.9Ref10.5Ref
Perceived partner non-monogamy, 0–4 months ago
 Yes48.82.72.1 to 3.4**33.24.63.0 to 7.0**
 No18.1Ref7.2Ref
Perceived partner non-monogamy, 4–8 months ago
 Yes36.81.91.5 to 2.4**15.31.40.9 to 2.3
 No19.5Ref10.8Ref
  • *p<0.05.

  • **p<0.01.

  • †Concurrency was defined as having overlapping partnerships during the 4-month recall period. Incident concurrency was defined as concurrency among participants who were not concurrent during the preceding recall period (ie, 4–8 months ago).

  • PR, prevalence ratio; RR, risk ratio.