Table 2

Results of estimated relative risk ratios (SE; lower, upper 95% CIs) of syphilis and HIV coinfection and monoinfection among YBMSM from the YMAP cohort (n=365), 2014–2016

Outcome categorySyphilis-HIV coinfectionSyphilis monoinfectionHIV monoinfection
Model specificationModel 1aModel 1bModel 1cModel 2Model 3
Subgroup outcome category relative to a reference subgroup in figure 1 Syphilis+HIV+(A) relative to
syphilis−HIV+(B)
Syphilis+HIV+(A) relative to
syphilis+HIV−(C)
Syphilis+HIV+(A) relative to
syphilis−HIV−(D)
Syphilis+HIV−(C) relative to
syphilis−HIV−(D)
Syphilis−HIV+(B) relative to
syphilis−HIV−(D)
RRRR of coinfection versus HIV monoinfectionRR of coinfection versus syphilis monoinfectionRR of coinfection versus neither infectionRR of syphilis monoinfection versus neither infectionRR of HIV monoinfection versus neither infection
Age1.06 (0.10; 0.88, 1.28)1.08 (0.12; 0.86, 1.35)1.06 (0.10; 0.89, 1.27)0.98 (0.10; 0.82, 1.19)1.00 (0.08; 0.86, 1.16)
Education (high school or less)0.19** (0.10; 0.07, 0.55)1.23 (0.82; 0.33, 4.51)0.38* (0.17; 0.15, 0.93)0.31* (0.18; 0.10, 0.94)1.95 (0.87; 0.82, 4.67)
Lifetime housing instability2.42 (1.43; 0.76, 7.72)1.52 (1.03; 0.40, 5.73)2.91*(1.55; 1.03 to 8.24)1.92 (1.14; 0.59, 6.17)1.20 (0.60; 0.45, 3.18)
Sex partners (prior 6 months)1.90† (0.64; 0.98, 3.68)1.70 (0.62; 0.83, 3.49)1.06 (0.26; 0.66, 1.71)0.63 (0.23; 0.30, 1.29)0.56† (0.18; 0.30, 1.05)
Sex partners with drug use0.92 (0.21; 0.60, 1.43)2.46† (1.30; 0.88, 6.92)1.13 (0.25; 0.73, 1.75)0.46 (0.24; 0.16, 1.30)1.22 (0.25; 0.82, 1.82)
Number of condomless bottom partners0.99 (0.41; 0.44, 2.25)1.15 (0.53; 0.46, 2.83)0.65 (0.22; 0.34, 1.25)0.57 (0.25; 0.24, 1.35)0.65 (0.22; 0.33, 1.28)
Number of condomless top partners0.71 (0.21; 0.39, 1.28)0.75 (0.28; 0.36, 1.54)1.46 (0.45; 0.79, 2.68)1.95† (0.69; 0.97, 3.90)2.06* (0.63; 1.13, 3.74)
Syphilis-infected network member(s)2.94† (1.90; 0.83, 10.46)2.47 (1.65; 0.67, 9.12)2.97* (1.60; 1.03, 8.52)1.20 (0.69; 0.39, 3.71)1.01 (0.57; 0.33, 3.04)
HIV-infected network member (s)4.38* (2.79; 1.25, 15.27)2.44 (1.61; 0.66, 8.95)2.73** (2.64; 1.58, 14.14)1.94 (1.16; 0.60, 6.24)1.08 (0.64; 0.34, 3.44)
Syphilis-HIV coinfected member(s)3.70* (2.45; 1.01, 13.53)6.15* (4.42; 1.50, 25.13)4.48** (2.44; 1.54, 13.04)0.73 (0.50; 0.19, 2.80)1.21 (0.74; 037, 3.99)
Number of health venues attended0.94 (0.14; 0.70, 1.26)1.08 (0.19; 0.77, 1.52)0.83 (0.11; 0.64, 1.08)0.77† (0.11; 0.58, 1.01)0.88 (0.10; 0.71, 1.10)
Number of social venues attended1.07 (0.11; 0.87, 1.32)0.92 (0.09; 0.75, 1.12)1.10 (0.09; 0.93, 1.30)1.19* (0.10; 1.02, 1.40)1.02 (0.09; 0.87, 1.21)
  • *P<0.05; **P<0.01; †P<0.01 for two-tailed test. Parentheses indicate SEs. The variable of city was controlled. Active syphilis infection is defined as having an RPR of 1:4 or greater. The results are based on analyses with RDS adjustments. The results of sociodemographic, behavioural and venue attendance variables are based on models that include a network variable of having coinfected member(s).

  • RDS, respondent-driven sampling; RPR, rapid plasma reagin; RR, relative risk; YBMSM, young Black men who have sex with men; YMAP, Young Men’s Affiliation Project.