Table 2

Data extracted from studies reporting women tested for urogenital chlamydia and/or studies reporting a history of anal intercourse rectal

StudyData for studies reporting urogenital CT testingData for studies reporting a history of AIAdditional information
Women, n (%)Women, n (%)
Rectal CT-positive and urogenital CT-positiveRectal CT-negative and urogenital CT-positiveRectal CT-positive and urogenital CT-negativeRectal CT-positive and urogenital CT-negativeTotalRectal CT-positive and
AI reported
Rectal CT-negative and
AI reported
Rectal CT-positive and
no AI reported
Rectal CT-negative and
no AI reported
Total
ABCDEFGHIJ
Bachmann et al 7 20 (23.8)3 (3.6)7 (8.3)54 (64.3)849 (9.0)30 (30.0)25 (25.0)36 (36.0)100High-risk settings (STD clinic and three HIV clinics) and women tested if were at high risk or had a history of AI
Bazan et al 8 38 (11.4)5 (1.5)6 (1.8)285 (85.3)33446 (13.5)295 (86.5)NANA341All women reported a history of AI.
Cosentino et al 26 21 (7.7)251 (92.3)NANA272No data were reported for urogenital CT infections. All women reported a history of AI.
Ding and Challenor9 97 (81.5)22 (18.5)NANA11920 (20.6)5 (5.2)55 (56.7)17 (17.5)97All women were positive for a urogenital CT infection.
Garner et al 29 6 (6.6)85 (93.4)NANA91All women reported a history of AI.
Gratrix et al 17 224 (7.3)76 (2.5)132 (4.3)2622 (85.9)305448 (13.0)13 (3.5)308 (83.5)Number of women who had a negative rectal CT test and did not report a history of AI is unknown from the data reported.
Hunte et al 27 16 (16.5)01 (1.0)80 (82.5)9717 (17.5)80 (82.5)NANA97All women reported a history of AI.
Mayer et al 30 There are no data on urogenital CT collected and no data on history of AI collected. All women were HIV-positive.
Musil et al 33 31 (55.4)7 (12.5)1 (1.8)17 (30.4)5617 (30.4)17 (30.4)15 (26.8)7 (12.5)56Women at high risk of infection (had symptoms, follow-up, sexual contact with a positive case)
Ostergaard et al 34 9 (4.6)11 (5.6)2 (1.0)174 (88.8)1964 (2.0)82 (41.8)7 (3.6)103 (52.6)196
Rodriguez-Hart et al 31 4 (3.6)00108 (96.4)112Of all women tested, four were positive for concurrent infections only. There are no data reported on history of AI.
Sethupathi et al 32 19 (12.2)3 (1.9)1 (0.6)133 (85.3)15610 (6.3)72 (45.0)10 (6.3)68 (42.5)160Women considered to be at high risk were tested for rectal CT (women who had contacts with gonorrhoea-positive individuals, women with anorectal symptoms, women who had been sexually assaulted).
van Liere et al 16 52 (8.0)21 (3.2)3 (0.5)578 (88.4)65416 (2.4)187 (28.6)39 (6.0)412 (63.0)654
van Rooijen et al 28 154 (9.3)1502 (90.7)NANA1656All women reported a history of AI.
  • A/E, concurrent infection among women tested for rectal CT; A/(A+B+C), concurrent infection among all women positive for CT regardless of site; A/(A+C), concurrent infection among women positive for rectal CT; F/J, women positive for rectal CT and reported AI among all women tested for rectal CT; F/(F+H), women who reported AI among all women positive for rectal CT.

  • AI, anal intercourse; CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; NA, not available.