Table 2

Comparison of inflammatory cells in rectal cytology samples of HIV-infected MSM with asymptomatic, symptomatic and without rectal CT/NG infection

No CT/NG infection (n=85*)Asymptomatic CT/NG infection (n=9*)Symptomatic CT/NG infection (n=8*)
Cytologies pos.
n/total (%)
Median density†Cytologies pos.
n/total (%)
Median density†Relative risk‡
(95% CI, P)
Cytologies pos.
n/total (%)
Median density†Relative risk‡
(95% CI, P)
Granulocytes39/85 (45.9)(+)3/9 (33.3)(+)0.812 (0.559 to 1.565, P=0.727)7/8 (87.5)++4.329 (1.120 to 24.310, P=0.030)
Lymphocytes7/85 (8.2)(+)1/9 (11.1)(+)1.032 (0.900 to 1.629, P=0.568)5/8 (62.5)+2.447 (1.314 to 6.717, P<0.001)
Histiocytes5/85 (5.9)(+)1/9 (11.1)(+)1.059 (0.931 to 1.669, P=0.463)5/8 (62.5)+2.519 (1.355 to 6.909, P<0.001)
  • *Total n=102: seven data sets excluded due to failed CT/NG nucleic acid amplification tests and one data set excluded due to insufficient quality of cytology sample (compare with table 1).

  • †Median cell density of cytology samples positive for the respective cell type (from (+) to +++; see the Methods section); samples negative for the respective cell type were not included in the analysis.

  • ‡Relative risk for the detection of the respective cell type compared with cytology samples from participants without CT/NG infection (Fisher’s exact test).

  • CT/NG, Chlamydia trachomatis and/or Neisseria gonorrhoeae; MSM, men who have sex with men.