Table 1

Associations between ‘reported sex with non-steady partners since lockdown’ and sociodemographic factors, sexual practices, drug, alcohol and PrEP use

Total sample
n=694
Did not have sex with non-steady partners during lockdown
n=632
Had sex with non-steady partners during lockdown
n=62
P value*
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Sociodemographic factors
 Age0.205
  18–35252 (36.3)230 (36.4)22 (35.5)
  36–55364 (52.4)327 (51.7)37 (59.7)
  56+78 (11.2)75 (11.9)3 (4.8)
 Living in Belgium682 (98.3)621 (98.3)61 (98.4)1.000
 Region†
  Flanders459 (67.3)409 (65.9)50 (82.0)0.024
  Brussels Region166 (24.3)156 (25.1)10 (16.4)
  Wallonia57 (8.4)56 (9.0)1 (1.6)
 Has steady partner403 (58.1)375 (59.3)28 (45.2)0.031
 HIV-positive status‡122 (18.1)99 (16.1)23 (38.3)<0.001
 Financial hardship before lockdown§39 (5.7)30 (4.8)9 (14.8)0.005
Sexual practices in the 3 months before lockdown
 Sex with multiple partners454 (65.4)397 (62.8)57 (91.9)<0.001
 Group sex246 (35.4)211 (33.4)35 (56.5)<0.001
 Chemsex133 (19.2)110 (17.4)23 (37.1)<0.001
 Sex work13 (1.9)9 (1.4)4 (6.5)0.022
Drug and alcohol use in the 3 months before lockdown
 Drug use248 (35.7)212 (33.5)36 (58.1)<0.001
 Alcohol use573 (82.6)524 (82.9)49 (79.0)0.442
PrEP use
 Used PrEP in the last 6 months¶199 (34.8)178 (33.4)21 (53.8)0.010
  • *P value for χ2 or Fisher’s exact test for associations between ‘having had sex with non-steady partners since 18 March’ and sociodemographic factors, sexual practices, drug, alcohol and PrEP use.

  • †‘Not living in Belgium’ (n=12) excluded.

  • ‡‘Don’t know’ (n=18) or ‘prefer not to say’ (n=2) were excluded from the analyses.

  • §Proportion of those who indicated to be struggling with their income before 18 March; ‘Prefer not to say’ (n=7) were excluded from the bivariate analysis.

  • ¶HIV-positive status (n=122) excluded.

  • PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis