Table 2

Difference in costs and effects of 3-monthly compared with 6-monthly screening for CT and NG infection in MSM at risk of an STI in the Netherlands over 10 years

TotalCTNG
TotalUrethralRectalTotalUrethralRectal
Total population
Averted infections18 24911 55074654085669925964104
Symptomatic 16 03310 64270843558539224872905
Asymptomatic 221590838252713071081199
Diagnosed asymptomatic infections*−243372−38−5712−71
QALY gained by averting infections92.161.140.920.231.014.416.5
Costs saved by averting infections (million €)7.24.73.01.72.41.11.3
Costs made for more frequent screening (million €)46.8
Population on PrEP
Averted infections4032254516299161487571916
Symptomatic 3539234325457981196547649
Asymptomatic 4932018311829124268
Diagnosed asymptomatic infections*−243372−38−5712−71
QALY gained by averting infections20.313.48.94.56.93.23.7
Costs saved by averting infections (million €)1.61.00.70.40.50.20.3
Costs made for more frequent screening (million €)46.8
Population not on PrEP
Averted infections14 218900558373169521220253188
Symptomatic 12 495829855382760419719402256
Asymptomatic 1723707298409101684931
Diagnosed asymptomatic infections*0000000
QALY gained by averting infections71.747.632.015.724.111.312.8
Costs saved by averting infections (million €)5.63.72.31.41.90.91.0
Costs made for more frequent screening (million €)0
  • *It is assumed that asymptomatic infections were only diagnosed at screening visits and thereby treated. Negative numbers indicate more infections being diagnosed and treated at the visits of 6-monthly screening after 10 years.

  • CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; MSM, men who have sex with men; NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year.