Included in the analysis (n=241)* | Excluded from the analysis (n=105)* | P value† | |||
n* | %* | n* | %* | ||
Demographics | |||||
Age (years) | 0.582 | ||||
Median (IQR) | 32 | (26–41) | 35 | (27–42) | |
<30 | 99 | 41.10 | 37 | 35.20 | |
30–39 | 73 | 30.30 | 34 | 32.40 | |
≥40 | 69 | 28.60 | 34 | 32.40 | |
Gender identity | 0.003 | ||||
Male | 223 | 92.50 | 105 | 100 | |
Female | 17 | 7.10 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Transgender | 1 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Ethnicity | 0.514 | ||||
Dutch | 158 | 65.60 | 65 | 61.90 | |
Non-Dutch | 83 | 34.40 | 40 | 38.10 | |
Highest education level | 0.040 | ||||
None/primary/secondary | 48 | 20.10 | 31 | 29.50 | |
College/university | 172 | 72.00 | 61 | 58.10 | |
Other | 19 | 8.00 | 13 | 12.40 | |
Health | |||||
Antibiotic use‡ | 0.934 | ||||
No | 171 | 85.50 | 85 | 85.90 | |
Yes | 29 | 14.50 | 14 | 14.10 | |
Coinfection with chlamydia | <0.001 | ||||
No | 232 | 96.30 | 83 | 79.10 | |
Yes | 9 | 3.70 | 22 | 21.00 | |
Sexual behaviour | |||||
Sexual risk group | <0.001 | ||||
MSM | 221 | 91.70 | 91 | 87.50 | |
MSW | 2 | 0.80 | 13 | 12.50 | |
Women | 17 | 7.10 | 0 | 0.00 | |
TGP | 1 | 0.40 | 0 | 0.00 | |
Number of sexual partners§ | |||||
Median (IQR) | 10 | (5–20) | 6 | (3–15) | 0.018 |
HIV characteristics | |||||
HIV status | 0.128 | ||||
Negative | 194 | 81.50 | 78 | 74.30 | |
Positive | 44 | 18.50 | 27 | 25.70 | |
cART use¶ | 0.55 | ||||
No | 1 | 2.30 | 2 | 8.00 | |
Yes | 42 | 97.70 | 23 | 92.00 | |
Most recent CD4 cell count (cells/µL)¶ | 0.517 | ||||
<350 | 0 | 0.00 | 1 | 5.00 | |
350–499 | 4 | 12.10 | 3 | 15.00 | |
≥500 | 29 | 87.90 | 16 | 80.00 | |
PrEP use** | 0.005 | ||||
No | 123 | 63.40 | 63 | 80.80 | |
Yes | 71 | 36.60 | 15 | 19.20 |
Data on the number of sexual partners were from the initial consultation, which is the T−1 visit, for all asymptomatic patients. All other data on sociodemographic, behavioural and HIV characteristics were from the T0 visit.
Data were missing (n=included/n=excluded) for education level (n=2/n=0), antibiotic use (n=41/n=6), sexual risk group (n=0/n=1), number of sexual partners (n=1/n=4), HIV status (n=3/n=0), cART use (n=1/n=2) and CD4 cell count (n=11/n=7).
Not all participants were tested at all anatomical sites; testing depended on own gender and gender of sexual partners. Number of NAATs not tested for anal (n=11), pharyngeal (n=13), vaginal (n=224) and urethral (n=18) samples.
*Unless otherwise stated.
†P values were calculated using χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test (for categorical data) and Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test (for continuous data).
‡In the preceding 3 months before the initial consultation.
§In the preceding 6 months before the initial consultation.
¶Among participants living with HIV.
**Among HIV-negative participants. All patients who used PrEP were MSM.
cART, combination antiretroviral therapy; MSM, men who have sex with men; MSW, men who have exclusively sex with women; NAAT, nucleic acid amplification test; NABOGO, New AntiBiotic treatment Options for uncomplicated GOnorrhoea; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis; TGP, transgender people.