Associations between possible risk factors and Shigella infections among MSM routinely visiting the STI clinic Amsterdam, March–June 2020
Shigella positive | P value* | OR | 95% CI | ||
Age in years, n (%) | 16–24 | 1/67 (1.5) | 0.808 | 1 | |
25–34 | 6/147 (4.1) | 2.81 | 0.33 to 23.80 | ||
35–44 | 2/78 (2.6) | 1.74 | 0.15 to 19.59 | ||
45–75 | 4/97 (4.1) | 2.84 | 0.31 to 25.98 | ||
Country of origin, n (%) | Netherlands | 8/161 (5.0) | 0.134 | 1 | |
Other | 5/228 (2.2) | 0.43 | 0.14 to 1.34 | ||
HIV and PrEP status, n (%) | HIV−, no PrEP use | 2/146 (1.4) | 0.038 | 1 | |
HIV−, PrEP use | 10/151 (6.6) | 5.11 | 1.10 to 23.72 | ||
HIV+ | 1/75 (1.3) | 0.97 | 0.09 to 10.91 | ||
Unknown | 0/17 | 0.61 | 0.03 to 13.13 | ||
No. of sex partners in last 6 months, n (%) | 0 or 1 | 2/35 (5.7) | 0.332 | 1 | |
2 or more | 11/352 (3.1) | 0.53 | 0.11 to 2.50 | ||
Unknown | 0/2 | N.A. | |||
NG, n (%) | Negative | 10/339 (3.0) | 0.226 | 1 | |
Positive | 3/50 (6.0) | 2.1 | 0.56 to 7.91 | ||
CT, n (%) | Negative | 12/354 (3.4) | 1.000 | 1 | |
Positive | 1/35 (2.9) | 0.84 | 0.11 to 6.64 | ||
Syphilis, n (%) | Negative | 12/384 (3.1) | 1.000 | 1 | |
Positive | 1/5 (20) | 7.75 | 0.80 to 74.7 | ||
Hepatitis B, n (%) | Negative | 13/388 (3.4) | 1.000 | N.A. | |
Positive | 0/1 | N.A. | N.A. | ||
Campylobacter, n (%) | Negative | 13/382 (3.4) | 1.000 | N.A. | |
Positive | 0/7 | N.A. | N.A. | ||
SARS-CoV-2, n (%) | Negative | 13/385 (3.4) | 1.000 | N.A. | |
Positive | 0/4 | N.A. | N.A. | ||
Anal symptoms, n (%) | None | 12/360 (3.3) | 1.000 | 1 | |
Yes | 1/29 (3.5) | 1.04 | 0.13 to 8.26 |
Results of univariable logistic regression. Table was created by the authors.
*P values were determined excluding men with unknown values.
CT, Chlamydia trachomatis; MSM, men having sex with men; NG, Neisseria gonorrhoeae; PrEP, pre-exposure prophylaxis.;