Table 3

Performance of different sampling tests among study participants with different risks of HPV infections, using PCR test as the reference

Self-sampled testClinician-sampled testP value*
High-risk HPVLow-risk HPVHigh-risk HPVLow-risk HPVHigh-risk HPVLow-risk HPV
Sensitivity, % (n/N) (95% CI)77.2 (61/79) (66.1 to 85.6)87.5 (35/40) (72.4 to 95.3)88.6 (70/79) (79.0 to 94.3)90.0 (36/40) (75.4 to 96.7)0.12371.0000
Specificity, % (n/N) (95% CI)100.0 (108/108) (95.7 to 100.0)100.0 (108/108) (95.7 to 100.0)100.0 (108/108) (95.7 to 100.0)100.0 (108/108) (95.7 to 100.0)
PPV, % (n/N) (95% CI)100.0 (79/79) (92.6 to 100.0)100.0 (40/40) (87.7 to 100.0)100.0 (79/79) (93.5 to 100.0)100.0 (40/40) (88.0 to 100.0)
NPV, % (n/N) (95% CI)96.4 (108/112) (90.6 to 98.8)86.4 (108/125) (78.8 to 91.6)97.3 (108/111) (91.7 to 99.3)93.1 (108/116) (86.4 to 96.8)
  • *McNemar’s χ2 test was done to compare sensitivity values between clinician-sampled and self-sampled tests.

  • HPV, human papillomavirus; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.