Regular Article
Urinary inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction and testing of multiple specimens may contribute to lower assay sensitivities for diagnosingChlamydia trachomatisinfected women

https://doi.org/10.1006/mcpr.1997.0109Get rights and content

Abstract

In a comparison of commercial ligase chain reaction (LCR; Abbott) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR; Roche) assays, measuring plasmid genes ofChlamydia trachomatis, some specimens were found to be negative by either or both assays but positive in traditional culture or antigen detection tests. Of 767 women, 35 were found to be infected by cervical or urine testing. Twenty three specimens from 16 women may have contained inhibitors in six cervical swabs (CS) and 15 first void urines (FVU). By performing dilution and «spiking» experiments on five FVU, inhibitors of PCR, LCR or both, which disappeared by dilution, were demonstrated. Confirmatory assays were used which amplified segments of the major outer membrane gene by PCR or LCR. When comparisons of assays were made on a single specimen type, the sensitivities of the amplification assays, compared to an expanded reference standard, were as follows: on CS, PCR was 93·8% (30/32) and LCR was 96·9% (31/32); on FVU, PCR was 76·6% (23/30) and LCR was 93·3% (28/30). When a combined calculation was made to determine the ability of the assays to detect patients infected in the cervix or urethra by testing FVU, the sensitivities dropped to 71·4% (25/35) for PCR and 80·0% (28/35) for LCR: CS sensitivity was 88·6% (31/35) for both amplified tests. There were two CS and five FVU false-positives by PCR which reduced to one CS and three FVU in the combined analysis. There were no false-positives by LCR. Inhibitors and low levels of chlamydial plasmid nucleic acids may have contributed to lower than expected sensitivities, suggesting a possible need for internal positive controls, especially for PCR, when testing urine. More studies with multiple sampling and more than one amplification assay are needed to confirm these findings and to identify and remove inhibitors of amplification assays.

References (32)

  • M. Skulnick et al.

    Use of the polymerase chain reaction for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    (1994)
  • H.H. Lee et al.

    Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Lancet

    (1995)
  • W.E. Stamm

    Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (1988)
  • W.E. Stamm et al.

    Chlamydia trachomatis

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (1984)
  • M.A. Chernesky et al.

    Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1990)
  • I.D. Paul et al.

    Evaluation of threeChlamydia trachomatis

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    (1990)
  • J.R. Schwebke et al.

    Use of a urine immunoassay as a diagnostic tool forChlamydia trachomatis

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    (1991)
  • I.P. Jensen

    A comparison of urine sample to urethral swab for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Sexually Transmitted Diseases

    (1992)
  • G.P. Leonardi et al.

    Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    (1992)
  • A. Stary et al.

    Chlamydia antigen detection in urine samples by immunofluorescence test

    Infection

    (1992)
  • J.W. Sellors et al.

    Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1991)
  • L.O. Svensson et al.

    Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Genitourinary Medicine

    (1991)
  • M.J. Loeffelholz et al.

    Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    (1992)
  • J.B. Mahony et al.

    Role of confirmatory PCRs in determining performance of Chlamydia amplicor PCR with endocervical specimens from women with a low prevalence of infection

    Journal of Clinical Microbiology

    (1994)
  • B. de Barbeyrac et al.

    Evaluation of the AmplicorChlamydia trachomatis

    Genitourinary Medicine

    (1994)
  • Cited by (0)

    f1

    Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed at: Medical Microbiology Services, St. Joseph's Hospital, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada

    View full text