Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epidemiological typing of neisseria gonorrhoeae: A comparative analysis of three monoclonal antibody serotyping panels

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Sixteen hundred and thirty seven isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated over a two year period were serotyped using three panels of monoclonal antibodies. The isolates comprised 687 serogroup WI strains and 950 serogroup WII/III strains. The antibodies used in the panels were those developed by Pharmacia (Ph) and Genetic Systems (GS). The GS antibodies were used as two separate panels; the American (GS-A) panel which designates serovars by a simple numerical nomenclature and the Swedish (GS-S) panel which designates serovars by a more detailed descriptive nomenclature. Using only a single panel the Ph panel gave the greatest discrimination yielding 42 serovars compared with 28 serovars with the GS-S panel and 23 serovars with the GS-A panel. Using two panels in combination, the GS-A/Ph panel combination gave the greatest discrimination with 81 serovar combinations while a combination of the GS-S and Ph panels yielded 77 serovar combinations. A compilation of antibodies from all three panels yielded 90 serovar combinations. As the combination of GS-A and Ph panels gave a greater degree of discrimination than the combination of the GS-S and Ph panels we advocate that first-stage serotyping should be performed with the more widely used GS-A panel while second-stage serotyping should be performed with the Ph panel. We propose that serovar combinations should be reported using a dual nomenclature e.g. IA-1/Arost, IB-1/Bropt, IB-1/Bropyt etc. The use of such a dual system would allow “core comparison” between all centres while maintaining a degree of flexibility regarding the extent of discrimination required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ansink-SchipperM. C., BygdemanS.M., vanKlingerenD. and SandstromS.G. (1988): Serovars, auxotypes, and plasmid profiles of PPNG strains with asian type plasmid isolated in Amsterdam. - Genitourin, Med. 64: 152–155.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BäckmannM., RudénA.-K.M., BygdemanS.M., FalkE.S., JonssonA., KallingsI., Ringertz0. and SandströmE.G. (1987): Comparison between serological classification and auxotyping in the analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. - Acta Path. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. B 95: 181–188.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BäckmanM., RudénA.-K.M., BygdemanS.M., JonssonA., RingertzO. and SandströmE.G. (1985): Gonococcal serovar distribution in Stockholm, with special reference to multiple infections and infected partners. - Acta Path. Microbiol. Immunol. Scand. Sect. B 93: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BrunhamR. C., PlummerF., SlaneyL., RandF. and DeWittW. (1985): Correlation of auxotype and protein I type with expression of disease due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae. - J. Infect. Dis. 152: 339–343.

    Google Scholar 

  5. BygdemanS.M. (1987): Polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies applied to the epidemiology of gonococcal infection. In: Young H. and McMillan A. (eds.) -Immunological diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Marcel Dekker, New York: 117–165.

    Google Scholar 

  6. BygdemanS.M., GilleniusE.C. and SandströmE.G. (1985): A comparison between two different sets of monoclonal antibodies for the serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In: The Pathogenic Neisseriae (Schoolnik G.K., Brooks G.F., Falkow S., Frasch C.E., Knapp J.S., McCutchan J.A. and Morse S.A. eds.): 31–36. - American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CoghillD.V., GaitondeR., KellyG. and YoungH. (1988): Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: serovars associated with homosexually acquired infection. In: Poolman J.T., Zanen H.C., Meyer T.F., Heckels J.E., Makela P.R.H., Smith H. and Beuvery E.C. (eds.) Gonococci and Meningococci - Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecth: 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. CoghillD.V. and YoungH. (1987): Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with monoclonal antibody coagglutination reagents. -Genitourin. Med. 63: 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  9. DillonJ.R., BygdemanS.M. and SandströmE.G. (1987): Serological ecology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (PPNG and non-PPNG) strains: Canadian perspective. - Genitourin. Med. 63: 160–168.

    Google Scholar 

  10. DillonJ.R., CarballoM., KingS.D. and BraithwaiteA.R. (1987): Auxotypes, plasmid contents, and serovars of gonococcal strains (PPNG and non-PPNG) from Jamaica. - Genitourin. Med. 63: 233–238.

    Google Scholar 

  11. JephcottA.E. and TurnerA. (1990): Ciprofloxacin resistance in gonococci. - Lancet 335: 165.

    Google Scholar 

  12. KnappJ.S., BygdemanS., SandströmE. and HolmesK.K. (1985): Nomenclature for the serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. In: The Pathogenic Neisseriae (Schoolnik G.K., Brooks G.F., Falkow S., Frasch C.E., Knapp J.S., McCutchan J.A. and Morse S.A. eds.). - American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  13. KnappJ.S., HolmesK.K., BoninP. and HookE.W. (1987): Epidemiology of gonorrhoea: Distribution and temporal changes in auxotype/serovar classes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. - Sex Transm. Dis. 14: 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  14. KnappJ.S., TamM.T., NowinskiR.C., HolmesK.K. and SandstromE.G. (1984): Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with use of monoclonal antibodies to gonococcal outer membrane protein I -J. Infect. Dis. 150: 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  15. KohlP.K., IsonC.A., DanielssonD., KnappJ.S. and PetzoldtD. (1990): Current status of serotyping of Neisseria gonorrhoeae - Eur. J. Epidemiol. 6: 91–95

    Google Scholar 

  16. KohlP.K., KnappJ.S., HofmannH., GruenderK., PetzoldtD., TamM.R. and HolmesK.K. (1986): Epidemiological analysis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Federal Republic of Germany by auxotyping and serological classification using monoclonal antibodies. - Genitourin. Med. 62: 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  17. SandströmE. and BygdemanS. (1988): Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Clinical and epidemiological applications. In: Poolman J.T., Zanen H.C., Meyer T.F., Heckels J.E., Makela P.R.H., Smith H. and Beuvery E.C. (eds.) Gonococci and Meningococci. - Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecth: 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  18. SandströmE.G., LindellP., HärfastB., BlombergF., RydenA.-C. and BygdemanS. (1985): Evaluation of a new set of Neisseria gonorrhoeae serogroup W-specific monoclonal antibodies for serovar determination. In: The Pathogenic Neisseriae (Schoolnik G.K., Brooks G.F., Falkow S., Frasch C.E., Knapp J.S., McCutchan J.A. and Morse S.A. eds.): 26–30. - American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  19. SarafianS.K. and KnappJ.S. (1989): Molecular Epidemiology of Gonorrhoeae. - Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2: 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  20. TzanakakiG., MavrommattiL., TzelepiE., KolyvaS. and FragouliE. (1989): Serological classification in relation to auxotypes, plasmid contents, and susceptibility to antimicrobials of PPNG and non-PPNG strains isolated in Greece. - Genitourin. Med. 65: 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  21. WhittingtonW.L., VernonA., BiddleJ.W., DeWittW., ZaidiA., StarcherT., PerkinsG., RiceR., AndersonB., JohnsonS. and AlbrittonW. (1985): Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: Uses at the community level. In: The Pathogenic Neisseriae (Schoolnik G.K., Brooks G.F., Falkow S., Frasch C.E., Knapp J.S., McCutchan J.A. and Morse S.A. eds.): 20–25. - American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  22. WoodfordN., BindaynaK.M., EasmonC.S.F. and IsonC.A. (1989): Associations between serotype and susceptibility to antibiotics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. -Genitourin. Med. 65: 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  23. YoungH. and MoyesA. (1989): Utility of monoclonal antibody coagglutination to identify Neisseria gonorrhoeae. - Genitourin. Med. 65: 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. YoungH., MoyesA., RobertsonD.H.H., McCartneyA.C., LindsayG., GallacherG., TaitL.B., BroganO., FoxC., KohiyarG.A., ParrattD. and AlexanderI. (1990): Gonococcal infection within Scotland: Antigenic heterogeneity and antibiotic susceptibility of infecting strains. - Eur. J. Epidemiol. 6: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  25. YoungH., MoyesA., TaitL.B., McCartneyA.C. and GallacherG. (1990): Non-typable quinolone-resistant gonococci. - Lancet 335: 604.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. STD Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Medical Microbiology, Edinburgh University Medical School, EH8 9AG, Edinburgh, Scotland

    A. Moyes & H. Young

Authors
  1. A. Moyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Corresponding author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moyes, A., Young, H. Epidemiological typing of neisseria gonorrhoeae: A comparative analysis of three monoclonal antibody serotyping panels. Eur J Epidemiol 7, 311–319 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144994

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00144994

Key words

Search

Navigation