Skip to main content
Log in

Is there a reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual behavior?

  • Published:
Archives of Sexual Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A psychometric analysis of the Sexual Experience Scale (SES) from the Derogatis Sexual Functioning Inventory was conducted. This sexual behavior measure was administered on four occasions to a large sample of normal, heterosexual, sexually active women and a comparable sample which underwent gynecologic treatment that resulted in a predictable and clinical level of sexual dysfunction. In terms of reliability, internal consistency estimates for the SES were in the .85 to .90 range, but the stability of the SES was lower and ranged from .55 to .85. An evaluation of the validity revealed both strengths and limitations of the SES. The content analysis reveals that a wider range of sexual behaviors is sampled by the SES than comparable measures. To examine construct validity, a factor analysis provided a five-factor solution which would account for 82% of the variance, but the solution was not stable across groups or time and the factors were not sensitive to detecting important behavior changes. As many other psychological measures, the SES was poor in predicting a criterion (i.e., the occurrence of sexual dysfunction) concurrently or at the time of follow-up. The outcome of this analysis is discussed in the context of selecting reliable and valid self-report measures of sexual behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 3rd ed., APA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L. (1981). A comparison of systematic desensitization and directed masturbation in the treatment of primary orgasmic dysfunction in females.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 49: 568–570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L. (1983). Primary orgasmic dysfunction: Diagnostic considerations and review of treatment.Psychol. Bull. 93: 105–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L. (1985). Sexual functioning morbidity among cancer survivors: Present status and future research directions.Cancer 55: 1835–1842.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L. (1987a). Conceptualization, assessment and research design: Study of sexual functioning among cancer patients.

  • Andersen, B. L. (1987b). Sexual functioning complications in women with gynecologic cancer: Outcomes and directions for prevention.Cancer 60: 2123–2128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L., Anderson, B., and deProsse, C. (in press). Controlled prospective longitudinal study of women with cancer: I. Sexual functioning outcomes.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol.

  • Andersen, B. L., and Hacker, N. F. (1983). Treatment for gynecologic cancer: A review of the effects on female sexuality.Health Psychol. 2: 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, B. L., Lachenbruch, P. A., Anderson, B., and deProsse, C. (1986). Sexual dysfunction and signs of gynecologic cancer.Cancer 57: 1880–1886.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968a). Heterosexual behavior assessment: I. Males.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1968b). Heterosexual behavior assessment: II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, J. P., and Levitt, E. E. (1965). The relationship of sexual preferences to sexual experience.Psychol. Rec. 15: 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L. J., and Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychol. Bull. 52: 281–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennerstein, L., and Burrows, G. D. (1982). Hormone replacement therapy and sexuality in women.Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 11: 661–679.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Derogatis, L. B., and Melisaratos, N. (1979). The DSFI: A multidimensional measure of sexual functioning.J. Sex Marital Ther. 5: 244–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halstrom, T. (1977). Sexuality in the climacteric. In Greenblatt, R. B., Studd, J. J., and Eastbourne, J. (eds.),Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 277–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, H. A. (1976).Modern Factor Analysis The Unitersity of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hite, S. (1976).The Hite Report MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, W. R., Adams, N. A., and Donder, H. M. (1983). Factor structure of the Symptom Checklist-90 with acute psychiatric inpatients.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51:535–538.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karoly, P. (ed.). (1985).Measurement Strategies in Health Psychology Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomroy, W. B., and Martin, C. E. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. C., Pomroy, W. B., Martin, C. E., and Gebhard, P. H. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korff, J., and Geer, J. H. (1983). The relationship between sexual arousal experience and genital response.Psychophysiology 20: 121–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, J., Heiman, J. R., Hogan, D. R., and Roberts, C. W. (1985). Effectiveness of single therapists versus cotherapy teams in sex therapy.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 53: 287–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, G. P., Lee, E. G., Bevington, D. J., Kuchemann, C. S., Crabtree, R. J., and Cornell, C. E. (1978). Psychiatric problems in the first year after mastectomy.Br. Med. J. 1: 963–965.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., and Johnson, V. E. (1970).Human Sexual Inadequacy Little, Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, T., Greer, H. S., and White, P. (1977). Psychological and social adjustment to mastectomy: A two-year follow-up study.Cancer 40: 2381–2387.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1901). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution, VII: On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable.Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. [Math. Phys. Sci.] 195: 1–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podell, L., and Perkins, J. C. (1957). A Guttman Scale for sexual experience: A methodological note.J. Abn. Soc. Psychol. 54: 420–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabalis, R. F. (1983). Assessing outcome in patients with sexual dysfunctions and sexual disorders. In Lambert, M. J., Christensen, E. R., and DeJulio, S. S. (eds.),The Assessment of Psychotherapy Outcome John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 205–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terman, L. M. (1938).Psychological Factors in Marital Happiness McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, C. E., Vincent, B., Greiss, F. C., and Linton, E. B. (1975). Some marital-sexual concomitants of carcinoma of the cervix.South. Med. J. 68: 522–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research was supported by Grant NIRA 1 R23 CA35702-01A1 from the National Cancer Institute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersen, B.L., Broffitt, B. Is there a reliable and valid self-report measure of sexual behavior?. Arch Sex Behav 17, 509–525 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542339

Key words

Navigation