Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detection of amplifiedChlamydia trachomatis DNA using a microtiter plate-based enzyme immunoassay

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A microtiter plate-based method to detect amplified DNA was developed. The method uses one biotin-labeled primer in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) mixture. The labeled amplicon is bound to streptavidin-coated microtiter plates, denatured and hybridized to a digoxigenin-labeled probe. The specificity of the hybridization reaction was optimized by varying the temperature of the subsequent washing step and adding urea to the washing buffer. The digoxigenin label was detected using an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). This PCR-EIA was compared with a standard PCR assay that uses gel electrophoresis, blotting and hybridization to detect the amplicon, with isolation in cell culture, and with an antigen detection EIA (Chlamydiazyme) in the diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infection in 309 female patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases outpatient clinic. The prevalence ofChlamydia trachomatis infection as determined by isolation in cell culture, EIA, PCR-EIA and standard PCR assay was 9.1 %, 8.7 %, 12.3 %, and 12.9 %, respectively. Compared with results of a reference set of confirmed-positive cases (defined by a positive result in two or more independent assays after analysis of discrepancies), the sensitivity and specificity was 71.1 % and 99.6 % for cell culture, 65.8 % and 99.3 % for the EIA, 92.1 % and 98.9 % for the PCR-EIA, and 97.4 % and 98.9 % for the standard PCR assay. It is concluded that the PCR-EIA described is a fast, sensitive and specific method for detectingChlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes RC: Laboratory diagnosis of human chlamydial infections. Clinical Microbiological Reviews 1989, 2: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Taylor-Robinson D: Laboratory methods for chlamydial infections. Journal of Infection 1992, 25, Supplement 1: 61–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor-Robinson D: The value of non-culture techniques for the diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 499–503.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schachter J, Stamm WE, Chernesky MA, Hook EW, Jones RB, Judson FN, K Kellogg JA, LeBar B, Mårdh PA, McCormack WM, Quinn TC, Ridgway GL, Taylor-Robinson D: Nonculture test for genital tract chlamydial infection: what does the package insert mean, and will it mean the same thing tomorrow? Sexually Transmitted Diseases 1992, 19: 243–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Birkenmeyer LG, Mushahwar IK: DNA probe amplification methods. Journal of Virological Methods 1991, 35: 117–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ossewaarde JM, Rieffe M, Rozenberg-Arska M, Ossenkoppele PM, Nawrocki RP, van Loon AM: Development and clinical evaluation of a polymerase chain reaction test for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2122–2128.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahony JB, Luinstra KE, Sellors JW, Chernesky MA: Comparison of plasmid- and chromosome-based polymerase chain reaction assays for detectingChlamydia trachomatis nucleic acids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1753–1758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roosendaal R, Walboomers JMM, Veltman OR, Melgers I, Burger C, Bleker OP, Maclaren DM, Meijer CJLM, Van den Brule AJC: Comparison of different primer sets for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis by the polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1993, 38: 426–433.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ossewaarde JM, Rieffe M, Buisman NJF, van Loon AM: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis conjunctivitis by polymerase chain reaction and detection of secretory immunoglobulin A. In: Bowie WR, Caldwell HD, Jones RP, Mårdh PA, Ridgway GL, Schachter J, Stamm WE, Ward ME (ed): Chlamydial infections. Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Human Chlamydial Infections. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990, p. 495–498.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ossewaarde JM, Plantema FHF, Rieffe M, Nawrocki RP, De Vries A, van Loon AM: Efficacy of single dose azithromycin versus doxycycline in the treatment of cervical infections caused byChlamydia trachomatis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1992, 11: 693–697.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kitchin PA, Bootman JS: Quality control of the polymerase chain reaction. Reviews of Medical Virology 1993, 3: 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lan J, Ossewaarde JM, Walboomers JMM, Meijer CJLM, Van den Brule AJC: Improved PCR sensitivity for direct genotyping ofChlamydia trachomatis serovars by using a nested PCR. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1994, 32: 528–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Griner PF, Mayewski RJ, Mushlin AI, Greenland P: Selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests and procedures. Annals of Internal Medicine 1981, 94: 553–600.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bobo L, Coutlee F, Yolken RH, Quinn T, Viscidi RP: Diagnosis ofChlamydia trachomatis cervical infection by detection of amplified DNA with an enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1968–1973.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wahlberg J, Lundeberg J, Hultman T, Uhlen M: General colorimetric method for DNA diagnostic allowing direct solid phase genomic sequencing of the positive samples. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1990, 87: 6569–6573.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loeffelholz MJ, Lewinski CA, Silver SR, Purohit AP, Herman SA, Nuonagurio DA, Dragon EA: Detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens by polymerase chain reaction. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 2847–2851.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Conway B, Bechtel LJ, Adler KA, D'Aquila RT, Kaplan JC, Hirsch M: Comparison of spot-blot and microtitre plate methods for the detection of HIV-1 PCR products. Molecular and Cellular Probes 1992, 6: 245–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Holmstrøm K, Rossen L, Rasmussen OF: A highly sensitive and fast nonradioactive method for detection of polymerase chain reaction products. Analytical Biochemistry 1993, 209: 278–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Landgraf A, Reckmann B, Pingoud A: Direct analysis of polymerase chain reaction products using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques. Analytical Biochemistry 1991, 198: 86–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Naif HM, Daniel RCW, Cougle WG, Lavin MF: Early detection of bovine leukemia virus by using an enzyme-linked assay for polymerase chain reaction-amplified proviral DNA in experimentally infected cattle. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 675–679.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzuki K, Naoaki N, Watanabe S, Kano T: Chemiluminescent microtiter method for detecting PCR amplified HIV-1 DNA. Journal of Virological Methods 1992, 38: 113–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kemp DJ, Smith DB, Foote SJ, Samaras N, Peterson MG: Colorimetric detection of specific DNA segments amplified by polymerase chain reactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 1989, 86: 2423–2427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kemp DJ, Churchill MJ, Smith DB, Biggs BA, Foote SJ, Peterson MG, Samaras N, Deacon NJ, Doherty R: Simplified colorimetric analysis of polymerase chain reactions: detection of HIV sequences in AIDS patients. Gene 1990, 94: 223–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wilson SM, Menerney R, Nye PM, Godfrey-Faussett PD, Stoker NG, Voller A: Progress toward a simplified polymerase chain reaction and its application to diagnosis of tuberculosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 776–782.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keller GH, Huang DP, Manak MM: A sensitive nonisotopic assay for HIV-1 DNA. Analytical Biochemistry 1989, 177: 27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawai S, Maekawajiri S, Yamane A: A simple method of detecting amplified DNA with immobilized probes on microtiter wells. Analytical Biochemistry 1993, 209: 63–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Suzuki K, Okamoto N, Kano T: Colorimetric detection for PCR amplified HIV-1 DNA using magnetic beads. Journal of Virological Methods 1993, 41: 341–350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Holloway B, Erdman DD, Durigon EL, Murtagh JJ: An exonuclease-amplification coupled capture technique improves detection of PCR product. Nucleic Acids Research 1993, 21: 3905–3906.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lüneberg E, Jensen JS, Frosch M: Detection ofMycoplasma pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive hybridization in microtiter plates. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1993, 31: 1088–1094.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Inouye S, Hondo R: Microplate hybridization of amplified viral DNA segment. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1469–1472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kluytmans JAJW, Niesters HGM, Mouton JW, Quint WGV, Ijpelaar JAJ, Van Rijsoort-Vos JH, Habbema L, Stolz E, Michel MF, Wagenvoort JHT: Performance of a nonisotopic DNA probe for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 2685–2689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas BJ, Osborn MF, Gilchrist C, Taylor-Robinson D: Improved sensitivity of an enzyme immunoassay IDEIA for detectingChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Clinical Pathology 1989, 42: 759–762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Katz B: A computer enhanced runs test for smoothed data. Statistics in Medicine 1988, 7: 795–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lefebvre J, Laperrière H, Rousseau H, Massé R: Comparison of three techniques for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens from asymptomatic women. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 726–731.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands

    J. M. Ossewaarde, M. Rieffe & A. M. van Loon

  2. Municipal Health Service, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    G. J. J. van Doornum & C. J. M. Henquet

Authors
  1. J. M. Ossewaarde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Rieffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. J. J. van Doornum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. J. M. Henquet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A. M. van Loon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ossewaarde, J.M., Rieffe, M., van Doornum, G.J.J. et al. Detection of amplifiedChlamydia trachomatis DNA using a microtiter plate-based enzyme immunoassay. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13, 732–740 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02276056

Keywords

Search

Navigation