Abstract
Although some rectal douches result in surface epithelium loss and potential increase of HIV transmission, men who have sex with men (MSM) continue to use them. We describe the prevalence of this practice among MSM engaging in unprotected receptive anal intercourse (URAI) in risky circumstances. A multiethnic sample with overrepresentation of HIV-negative MSM who had URAI in the previous year was recruited exclusively through the Internet. Participants were 105 MSM (78 HIV-negative, 27 HIV-positive). A total of 53% of HIV-negative and 96% of HIV-positive men douched in preparation for sex, most of them frequently or always, mainly for hygienic purposes. 27% of HIV-negative and 44% of HIV-positive douched after sex, partly believing douching protected from infections. Douching practices started around age 25. Regression analyses found the association between HIV status and douching occasions persisted after controlling for demographic characteristics and number of URAI occasions. Rectal douching in preparation for sex is common among men who practice URAI. This population could benefit from alternatives to condoms, such as rectal microbicides. Given the popularity of pre-coital douching and its frequency, a harmless rectal douche that could deliver a rectal microbicide could have great acceptability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bienzle, U., Guggenmoos-Holzmann, I., Zwingenberger, K., Thommsen, R., Ritter, K., & Uy, A., et al. (1985). Lymphadenopathy and antibodies to HTLV-III in homosexual men Clinical, laboratory and epidemiological features. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 63, 597–602.
Carballo-Diéguez, A., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2004). “Barebacking”: Intentional condomless anal sex in HIV-risk contexts: Reasons for and against it. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 1–16.
Carballo-Diéguez, A., Dowsett, G. A., Ventuneac, A., Remien, R. H., Balan, I., Dolezal, C., Luciano, O., & Lin, P. (2006). Cybercartography of popular Internet sites used by New York City men who have sex with men interested in bareback sex. AIDS Education & Prevention, 18(6), 475–489.
Carballo-Diéguez, A., Exner, T., Dolezal, C., Pickard, R., Lin, P., & Mayer, K. H. (2007). Rectal microbicide acceptability: Results of a volume escalation trial. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 34(4), 224–229.
Carballo-Diéguez, A., Stein, Z., Saez, H., Dolezal, C., Nieves-Rosa, L., & Diaz, F. (1999). Frequent use of lubricants for anal sex among men who have sex with men: the HIV prevention potential of a microbicidal gel. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1117–1121.
Deininger, S., Müller, R., Guggenmoos-Holzmann, I., Laukamm-Josten, U., & Bienzle, U. (1990). Behavioral characteristics and laboratory parameters in homo- and bisexual men in West Berlin: An evaluation of five years of testing and counseling on AIDS. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 68, 906–913.
Fuchs, E. J., Lee, L. A., Torbenson, M. S., Parsons, T. L., Bakshi, R. P., & Guidos, A. M., et al. (2007). Hyperosmolar sexual lubricant causes epithelial damage in the distal colon: Potential implication for HIV transmission. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 195(5), 703–710.
Hylton, J., Hendrix, C., & Fuchs, E. (2004). An assessment of sexual practices affecting the feasibility of microbicide development among MSM. Oral Poster presented at Microbicides 2004, London.
Koblin, B. A., Mayer, K., Mwatha, A., Brown-Peterside, P., Holt, R., & Marmor, M., et al. (2002). Douching practices among women at high risk of HIV infection in the United States: Implications for microbicide testing and use. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 29, 406–410.
Koziol, D. E., Saah, A. J., Odaka, N., & Munoz, A. (1993). A comparison of risk factors for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus infections in homosexual men. Annals of Epidemiology, 3, 434–441.
Martino, J. L., & Vermund, S. H. (2002). Vaginal douching: Evidence for risks or benefits to women’s health. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24, 109–124.
Moss, A. R., Osmond, D., Bacchetti, P., Chermann, J. C., Barre-Sinoussi, F., & Carlson, J. (1987). Risk factors for AIDS and HIV seropositivity in homosexual men. American Journal of Epidemiology, 125, 1035–1047.
Ndimbie, O. K., Kingsley, L. A., Nedjar, S., & Rinaldo, C. R. (1996). Hepatitis C virus infection in male homosexual cohort: Risk factor analysis. Genitourinary Medicine, 72, 213–216.
Ness, R. B., Hillier, S. L., Richter, H. E., Soper, D. E., Stamm, C., & Bass, D. C., et al. (2003). Why women douche and why they may or may not stop. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 30, 71–74.
Phillips, D., Taylor, C., Zacharopoulos, V., & Maguire, R. (2000). Nonoxynol-9 causes rapid exfoliation of sheets of rectal epithelium. Contraception, 62, 149–154.
Prentice, R. L., & Pyke, R. (1979). Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Boimetrika, 66(3), 403–411.
Schmelzer, M., Schiller, L. R., Meyer, R., Rugari, S. M., & Case, P. (2004). Safety and effectiveness of large-volume enema solutions. Applied Nursing Research, 17, 265–274.
Schreeder, M. T., Thompson, S. E., Hadler, S. C., Berquist, K. R., Zaidi, A., & Maynard, J. E., et al. (1982). Hepatitis B in homosexual men: Prevalence of infection and factors related to transmission. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 146, 7–15.
Suarez, T., & Miller, J. (2001). Negotiating risks in context: A perspective on unprotected anal intercourse and barebacking among men who have sex with men—Where do we go from here? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 287–300.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carballo-Diéguez, A., Bauermeister, J.A., Ventuneac, A. et al. The Use of Rectal Douches among HIV-uninfected and Infected Men who Have Unprotected Receptive Anal Intercourse: Implications for Rectal Microbicides. AIDS Behav 12, 860–866 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9301-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9301-0