Abstract
We assessed trends in behavioral risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men (MSM). Seattle MSM participated in random digit dial telephone surveys in 2003 (n = 400) and 2006 (n = 400). Fourteen percent in 2003 and 9% in 2006 reported unprotected anal intercourse with a partner of different or unknown HIV status (non-concordant UAI; odds ratio [OR] = 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.5, 1.2). Compared to participants in 2003, participants in 2006 met a greater proportion of their anal sex partners through the Internet (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.2, 3.1). Although the proportion of anal sex partnerships formed online increased between 2003 and 2006, Internet partnerships were not more risky than those initiated elsewhere. While the emergence of the Internet as a venue through which men meet partners demonstrates that sexual risk among MSM remains highly dynamic, our findings suggest that sexual risk behavior among MSM is currently stable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen SY, Gibson S, Katz MH, et al. Continuing increases in sexual risk behavior and sexually transmitted diseases among men who have sex with men: San Francisco, Calif, 1999–2001, USA. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(9):1387–8.
Katz MH, Schwarcz SK, Kellogg TA, et al. Impact of highly active antiretroviral treatment on HIV seroincidence among men who have sex with men: San Francisco. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(3):388–94.
Hall HI, Song R, Rhodes P, et al. Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. JAMA. 2008;300(5):520–9.
Fenton KA, Imrie J. Increasing rates of sexually transmitted diseases in homosexual men in Western Europe and the United States: why? Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2005;19(2):311–31.
Mansergh G, Purcell DW, Stall R, et al. CDC consultation on methamphetamine use and sexual risk behavior for HIV/STD infection: summary and suggestions. Public Health Rep. 2006;121(2):127–32.
McFarlane M, Bull SS, Rietmeijer CA. The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. JAMA. 2000;284(4):443–6.
Klausner JD, Wolf W, Fischer-Ponce L, et al. Tracing a syphilis outbreak through cyberspace. JAMA. 2000;284(4):447–9.
MacKellar DA, Gallagher KM, Finlayson T, et al. Surveillance of HIV risk and prevention behaviors of men who have sex with men–a national application of venue-based, time–space sampling. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(Suppl 1):39–47.
Lansky A, Sullivan PS, Gallagher KM, et al. HIV behavioral surveillance in the US: a conceptual framework. Public Health Rep. 2007;122(Suppl 1):16–23.
Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, et al. Trends in sexual behaviour among London homosexual men 1998–2003: implications for HIV prevention and sexual health promotion. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(6):451–4.
Hart GJ, Williamson LM. Increase in HIV sexual risk behaviour in homosexual men in Scotland, 1996–2002: prevention failure? Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81(5):367–72.
Williamson LM, Dodds JP, Mercey DE, et al. Increases in HIV-related sexual risk behavior among community samples of gay men in London and Glasgow: how do they compare? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;42(2):238–41.
Hickson FC, Reid DS, Davies PM, et al. No aggregate change in homosexual HIV risk behaviour among gay men attending the Gay Pride festivals, United Kingdom, 1993–1995. AIDS. 1996;10(7):771–4.
Nardone A, Mercey D, Johnson AM, et al. Developing surveillance for HIV transmission and risk behaviours among high-risk groups in a central London health district. J Public Health Med. 1999;21(2):208–14.
Elford J, Bolding G, Davis M, et al. Web-based behavioral surveillance among men who have sex with men: a comparison of online and offline samples in London, UK. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35(4):421–6.
Wiessing LG, Houweling H, Sandfort TG, et al. Reaching homosexual men for HIV surveillance through a gay magazine. Eur J Epidemiol. 1999;15(5):429–37.
Catania JA, Osmond D, Stall RD, et al. The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):907–14.
Webster RD, Darrow WW, Paul JP, et al. HIV infection and associated risks among young men who have sex with men in a Florida resort community. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2003;33(2):223–31.
Baral S, Sifakis F, Cleghorn F, et al. Elevated risk for HIV infection among men who have sex with men in low- and middle-income countries 2000–2006: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2007;4(12):e339.
Brewer DD, Golden MR, Handsfield HH. Unsafe sexual behavior and correlates of risk in a probability sample of men who have sex with men in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(4):250–5.
American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. Lenexa, Kansas: AAPOR; 2006.
Osmond DH, Pollack LM, Paul JP, et al. Changes in prevalence of HIV infection and sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men in San Francisco: 1997–2002. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(9):1677–83.
Xia Q, Osmond DH, Tholandi M, et al. HIV prevalence and sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men: results from a statewide population-based survey in California. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;41(2):238–45.
Public Health—Seattle & King County. Public Health—Seattle & King County STD Data and Statistical Resources. Available at: http://www.kingcounty.gov/healthservices/health/communicable/std/statistics.aspx. Accessed 10 Oct 2008.
Marrie RA, Dawson NV, Garland A. Quantile regression and restricted cubic splines are useful for exploring relationships between continuous variables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):511—517, e511.
Zeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986;42(1):121–30.
Mancl LA, DeRouen TA. A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties. Biometrics. 2001;57(1):126–34.
Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2(8):e124.
Elford J, Bolding G, Sherr L, et al. High-risk sexual behaviour among London gay men: no longer increasing. AIDS. 2005;19(18):2171–4.
Golden MR, Wood RW, Buskin SE, et al. Ongoing risk behavior among persons with HIV in medical care. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(5):726–35.
Golden MR, Stekler J, Hughes JP, et al. HIV serosorting in men who have sex with men: is it safe? J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008;49(2):212–8.
Smith DM, Richman DD, Little SJ. HIV superinfection. J Infect Dis. 2005;192(3):438–44.
Mao L, Crawford JM, Hospers HJ, et al. “Serosorting” in casual anal sex of HIV-negative gay men is noteworthy and is increasing in Sydney, Australia. AIDS. 2006;20(8):1204–6.
Bolding G, Davis M, Hart G, et al. Where young MSM meet their first sexual partner: the role of the Internet. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(4):522–6.
Evans AR, Wiggins RD, Mercer CH, et al. Men who have sex with men in Great Britain: comparison of a self-selected internet sample with a national probability sample. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83(3):200–5. (discussion 205).
Bolding G, Davis M, Hart G, et al. Gay men who look for sex on the Internet: is there more HIV/STI risk with online partners? AIDS. 2005;19(9):961–8.
Horvath KJ, Rosser BR, Remafedi G. Sexual risk taking among young internet-using men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(6):1059–67.
Chiasson MA, Hirshfield S, Remien RH, et al. A comparison of on-line and off-line sexual risk in men who have sex with men: an event-based on-line survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;44(2):235–43.
Berry M, Raymond HF, Kellogg T, et al. The Internet, HIV serosorting and transmission risk among men who have sex with men, San Francisco. AIDS. 2008;22(6):787–9.
Rietmeijer CA, Patnaik JL, Judson FN, et al. Increases in gonorrhea and sexual risk behaviors among men who have sex with men: a 12-year trend analysis at the Denver Metro Health Clinic. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(7):562–7.
Truong HM, Kellogg T, Klausner JD, et al. Increases in sexually transmitted infections and sexual risk behaviour without a concurrent increase in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men in San Francisco: a suggestion of HIV serosorting? Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82(6):461–6.
Van der Bij AK, Kolader ME, de Vries HJ, et al. Condom use rather than serosorting explains differences in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;45(5):574–80.
Schwarcz S, Spindler H, Scheer S, et al. Assessing representativeness of sampling methods for reaching men who have sex with men: a direct comparison of results obtained from convenience and probability samples. AIDS Behav. 2007;11(4):596–602.
Dodds JP, Mercer CH, Mercey DE, et al. Men who have sex with men: a comparison of a probability sample survey and a community based study. Sex Transm Infect. 2006;82(1):86–7.
Valleroy LA, MacKellar DA, Karon JM, et al. HIV prevalence and associated risks in young men who have sex with men. Young Men’s Survey Study Group. JAMA. 2000;284(2):198–204.
Stueve A, O’Donnell LN, Duran R, et al. Time–space sampling in minority communities: results with young Latino men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):922–6.
Choi KH, McFarland W, Neilands TB, et al. An opportunity for prevention: prevalence, incidence, and sexual risk for HIV among young Asian and Pacific Islander men who have sex with men, San Francisco. Sex Transm Dis. 2004;31(8):475–80.
Xia Q, Tholandi M, Osmond DH, et al. The effect of venue sampling on estimates of HIV prevalence and sexual risk behaviors in men who have sex with men. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(9):545–50.
Pollack LM, Osmond DH, Paul JP, et al. Evaluation of the center for disease control and prevention’s HIV behavioral surveillance of men who have sex with men: sampling issues. Sex Transm Dis. 2005;32(9):581–9.
City-data.com. Available at: http://www.city-data.com. Accessed 9 Sep 2008.
Kempf AM, Remington PL. New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:113–26.
CDC. BRFSS Annual Survey Data: Summary Data Quality Reports. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical_infodata/quality.htm. Accessed 9 Sep 2008.
CDC. Trends in the National Immunization Survey (NIS) repsonse rates and vaccination coverage rates. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nis/notice.htm. Accessed 23 Sep 2008.
Oldendick RW. The answering machine generation: who are they and what problem do they pose for survey research? Public Opin Q. 1994;58:264–73.
Blumberg SJ, Luke JV. Wireless substitution: early release of estimates based on data from the National Health Interview Survey, July–December 2006. National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed 9 Sep 2008.
Blumberg SJ, Luke JV, Cynamon ML. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(5):926–31.
White E, Armstrong B, Saracci R. Principles of exposure measurement in epidemiology: collecting, evaluating and improving measures of disease risk factors. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
Austin MA, Criqui MH, Barrett-Connor E, et al. The effect of response bias on the odds ratio. Am J Epidemiol. 1981;114(1):137–43.
Acknowledgments
Devon Brewer provided valuable feedback during the preparation of the manuscript. The authors thank JoElla Weybright, Laurie Burke, and others at Gilmore Research Group for their efforts in collecting the data and help in refining the sampling design. The 2003 RDD was supported by a Comprehensive STD Prevention System Syphilis Elimination grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the 2006 RDD was supported by a grant to MRG (NIH K23 AI01846). TWM was supported by NIH T32 AI07140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Menza, T.W., Kerani, R.P., Handsfield, H.H. et al. Stable Sexual Risk Behavior in a Rapidly Changing Risk Environment: Findings from Population-Based Surveys of Men Who Have Sex with Men in Seattle, Washington, 2003–2006. AIDS Behav 15, 319–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9626-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9626-y