Skip to main content
Log in

Social Networks of PLHA in Uganda: Implications for Mobilizing PLHA as Agents for Prevention

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
AIDS and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to describe the social networks of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) and explore the implications social network characteristics might have for mobilizing PLHA as prevention agents. Thirty-nine PLHA attending an HIV clinic in Kampala, Uganda provided information on themselves and on 20 network members. Based on these data, descriptive statistics for social network composition and structure were calculated. Research questions relating these network characteristics to treatment-related variables such as time since diagnosis, ART status, and time on ART were investigated. Analyses reveal that, in general, network members know the PLHA’s status, are trusted, provide advice and support, and are well-connected to each other. Network features (e.g., proportion of individuals who know the PLHA’s status) are related to the previously mentioned treatment variables. Findings suggest that PLHA surround themselves with a social context that enables PLHA to feel fairly protected and supported if they choose to discuss HIV and prevention. With respect to treatment, those on ART may be better prepared to act as prevention advocates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Knowlton AR, Hua W, Latkin C. Social support networks and medical service use among HIV-positive injection drug users: implications to intervention. AIDS Care. 2005;17(4):479–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Latkin C, Mandell W, Oziemkowska M, Celentano D, Vlahov D, Ensminger M, et al. Using social network analysis to study patterns of drug use among urban drug users at high risk for HIV/AIDS. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1995;38(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Muth SQ. Network structural dynamics and infectious disease propagation. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10(3):182–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, et al. Social network dynamics and HIV transmission. AIDS. 1998;12(12):1529–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. el-Bassel N, Chen DR, Cooper D. Social support and social network profiles among women on methadone. Soc Serv Rev. 1998;72:379–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. el-Bassel N, Cooper DK, Chen DR, Schilling RF. Personal social networks and HIV status among women on methadone. AIDS Care. 1998;10(6):735–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Latkin CA, Mandell W, Vlahov D, Oziemkowska M, Celentano DD. The long-term outcome of a personal network-oriented HIV prevention intervention for injection drug users: the SAFE study. Am J Community Psychol. 2006;24(3):341–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montgomery SB, Hyde J, De Rosa CJ, Rohrbach LA, Ennett S, Harvey SM, et al. Gender differences in HIV risk behaviors among young injectors and their social network members. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2002;28(3):453–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Latkin CA, Forman V, Knowlton A, Sherman S. Norms, social networks, and HIV-related risk behaviors among urban disadvantaged drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56:465–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ncama BP, McInerney PA, Bhengu BR, Corless IB, Wantland DJ, Nicholas PK, et al. Social support and medication adherence in HIV disease in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(12):1757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nachega JB, Knowlton AR, Deluca A, Schoeman JH, Watkinson L, Efron A, et al. Treatment supporter to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected South African adults. A qualitative study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;1(43 Suppl 1):S127–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campero L, Herrera C, Kendall T, Caballero M. Bridging the gap between antiretroviral access and adherence in Mexico. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(5):599–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heaney CA, Israel BA. Social networks and social support. In: Glanz K, Lewis FM, Rimer BK, editors. Social networks and social support in health behavior and health education theory, research, and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Valente TW, Fosados R. Diffusion of innovations and network segmentation: the part played by people in promoting health. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33(7 Suppl):S23–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cialdini RB, Trost MR. Social influence: social norms, conformity, and compliance. In: Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Lindzey G, editors. The handbook of social psychology. 4th ed. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill; 1998. p. 151–92.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions in hypothetical situations involving risk. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;21:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bandura A, Walters RH. Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston; 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pickett CL, Gardner WL. The social monitoring system: enhanced sensitivity to social cues and information as an adaptive response to social exclusion and belonging need. In: Williams K, Forgas J, von Hippel W, editors. The social outcast: ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2005. p. 213–26.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly RB, Zyzanski SJ, Alemagno SA. Prediction of motivation and behavior change following health promotion: role of health beliefs, social support, and self-efficacy. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(3):311–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burns TR, Dietz T. Cultural evolution: social rule systems, selection and human agency. Int Sociol. 1992;7(3):259–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berger BE, Ferrans CE, Lashley FR. Measuring stigma in people with HIV: psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(6):518–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC, Jooste S, Toefy Y, Cain D, Cherry C, et al. Development of a brief scale to measure AIDS-related stigma in South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(2):135–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Campbell K, Lee B. Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Soc Networks. 1991;13:203–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCarty C. Measuring structure in personal networks. J Soc Struct. 2002;3:1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. McCarty C, Bernard H, Killworth P, Shelley GA, Johnsen EC. Eliciting representative samples of personal networks. Soc Networks. 1997;19:303–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McCarty C, Kilworth PD, Rennell J. Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Soc Networks. 2007;29(2):300–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wasserman S, Faust KB. social network analysis: methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kamada T, Kawai S. An algorithm for drawing general, undirected graphs. Inf Process Lett. 1989;31(1):7–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ntozi JPM, Nakayiwa S. AIDS in Uganda: how has the household coped with the epidemic? In: Caldwell JC, Orubuloye IO, Ntozi JPM, editors. The continuing African HIV/AIDS epidemic. Canberra, Australia: Health Transition Centre, National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University; 1999. p. 155–181.

  31. King R, Katuntu D, Lifshay J, Packel L, Batamwita R, Nakayiwa S, et al. Processes and outcomes of HIV serostatus disclosure to sexual partners among people living with HIV in Uganda. AIDS Behav. 2008;12(2):232–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaleeba N, Kalibala S, Kaseje M, Ssebbanja P, Anderson S, van Praag E, et al. Participatory evaluation of counseling, medical and social services of the AIDS support organization (TASO) in Uganda. AIDS Care. 1997;9(1):13–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maman S, Abler L, Parker L, Lane T, Chirowodza A, Ntogwisangu J, et al. A comparison of HIV stigma and discrimination in five international sites: the influence of care and treatment resources in high prevalence settings. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:2271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Maughan-Brown B. Stigma rises despite antiretroviral roll-out: a longitudinal analysis in South Africa. Soc Sci Med. 2009 [Epub ahead of print].

  35. Tracy EM, Whittaker JK. The social network map: assessing social support in clinical practice. Fam Soc. 1990;71(8):461–70.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rempel GR, Neufeld A, Kushner KE. Interactive use of genograms and ecomaps in family caregiving research. J Fam Nurs. 2007;13(4):403–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelly JA. Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programs. AIDS Care. 2004;16:139–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the contributions of our field interviewers Annet Nannungi, Christopher Tumwine, Nicolate Nekesa, and Eric Ssegujja.

Funding

This research was generously supported through NIH grant R24 HD056651-01, PI: Wabwire-Mangen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harold D. Green Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, H.D., Atuyambe, L., Ssali, S. et al. Social Networks of PLHA in Uganda: Implications for Mobilizing PLHA as Agents for Prevention. AIDS Behav 15, 992–1002 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9707-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-010-9707-y

Keywords

Navigation