Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Relationship Power and Sexual Risk among Women in Community-Based Substance Abuse Treatment

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Relationship power has been highlighted as a major factor influencing women’s safer sex practices. Little research, however, has specifically examined relationship power in drug-involved women, a population with increased risk for HIV transmission. Using baseline data from a National Institute on Drug Abuse Clinical Trials Network multisite trial of a women’s HIV prevention intervention in community-based drug treatment programs, this paper examined the association between sexual relationship power and unprotected vaginal or anal sex. The Sexual Relationship Power Scale, a measure of relationship control and decision-making dominance, was used to assess the association between power and unprotected sex in relationships with primary male partners. It was hypothesized that increased relationship power would be associated with decreased unprotected sexual occasions, after controlling for relevant empirical and theoretical covariates. Findings show a more complex picture of the association between power and sexual risk in this population, with a main effect in the hypothesized direction for decision-making dominance but not for relationship control. Possible explanations for these findings are discussed, and future research directions for examining power constructs and developing interventions targeting relationship power among drug-involved women are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control. HIV and AIDS in the United States: a picture of today’s epidemic. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/united_states.htm. Accessed on: September 8, 2008.

  2. Simoni JM, Walters KL, Nero DK. Safer sex among HIV + women: the role of relationships. Sex Roles. 2000; 42(7/8): 691–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. St. Lawrence JS, Eldridge GD, Reitman D, Little CE, Shelby MC, Brasfield TL. Factors influencing condom use among African American women: implications for risk reduction interventions. Am J Community Psychol. 1998; 26(1): 7–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiss W, Whelan D, Gupta GR. Gender, sexuality and HIV: making a difference in the lives of young women in developing countries. Sex Rel Theor. 2000; 15(3): 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amaro H. Love, sex, and power: considering women’s realities in HIV prevention. Am Psychol. 2005; 50(6): 437–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fullilove M, Fullilove RE, Haynes K, Gross S. Black women and AIDS prevention: a view towards understanding the gender rules. J Sex Res. 1990; 27: 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tiefer L. The social construction and social effects of sex research: the sexological model of sexuality. In: Travis CB, White JW, eds. Sexuality, Society, and Feminism. Psychology of Women, vol. 4. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2000: 79–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Pulerwitz J, Gortmaker SL, De Jong W. Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles. 2000; 42(7/8): 637–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Partner influences and gender-related factors associated with noncondom use among young adult African American women. Am J Community Psychol. 1998; 26: 29–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenkins SR. Toward theory development and measure evolution for studying women’s relationships and HIV infection. Sex Roles. 2000; 42(7/8): 751–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ. Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Educ Behav. 2000; 27(5): 539–565.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Castaneda D. The close relationship context and HIV/AIDS risk reduction among Mexican Americans. Sex Roles. 2000; 42(7/8): 551–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pulerwitz J, Amaro H, De Jong W, Gortmaker SL, Rudd R. Relationship power, condom use and HIV risk among women in the USA. AIDS Care. 2002; 14(6): 789–800.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amaro H, Larson M, Zhang A, Acevedo A, Dai J, Matsumoto A. Effects of trauma intervention on HIV sexual risk behaviors among women with co-occurring disorders in substance abuse treatment. J Community Psychol. 2007; 35(7): 895–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Logan TK, Cole J, Leukefeld C. Women, sex, and HIV: social and contextual factors, meta-analysis of published interventions, and implications for practice and research. Psychol Bull. 2002; 128(6): 851–885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Bassel N, Schilling RF, Irwin KL, et al. Sex trading and psychological distress among women recruited from the streets of Harlem. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87(1): 66–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Rajah V, Foleno A, Frye V. Social supports among women in methadone treatment who experience partner violence: isolation and male controlling behavior. Viol Against Women. 2001; 7(3): 246–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Volkow ND, Wang G, Fowler JS, Telang F, Jayne M, Wong C. Stimulant-induced enhanced sexual desire as a potential contributing factor in HIV transmission. Am J Psychiatry. 2007; 164: 157–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Buffum J. Pharmacosexology update: heroin and sexual function. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1983; 15(4): 317–318.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. El-Bassel N, Gilbert L, Rajah V. The relationship between drug abuse and sexual performance among women on methadone heightening the risk of sexual intimate partner violence and HIV. Addict Behav. 2003; 28: 1385–1403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Connell RW. Gender and Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Emerson RM. Social exchange theory. Ann Rev Sociology. 1976; 2: 335–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Riley NE. Gender, power, and population change. Popul Bull. 1997; 52(1): 2–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim JC, Watts CH, Hargreaves JR, et al. Understanding the impact of a microfinance-based intervention on women’s empowerment and the reduction of intimate partner violence in South Africa. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(10): 1794–1802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Harvey SM, Bird ST. What makes women feel powerful? An exploratory study of relationship power and sexual decision-making with African Americans at risk for HIV/STDs. Women Health. 2004; 39(3): 1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow S. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet. 2004; 363(9419): 1415–1421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kershaw TS, Small M, Joseph G, Theodore M, Bateau R, Frederic R. The influence of power on HIV risk among pregnant women in rural Haiti. AIDS Behav. 2006; 10(3): 309–318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pettifor AE, Measham DM, Rees HV, Padian NS. Sexual power and HIV risk, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10(11): 1996–2004.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Centers for Disease Control. HIV/AIDS among women. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/women.htm. Accessed on: September 8, 2008.

  30. Albarracin D, McNatt PS, Klein CT, Ho RM, Mitchell AL, Kumkale GT. Persuasive communications to change actions: an analysis of behavioral and cognitive impact in HIV prevention. Health Psychol. 2003; 22(2): 166–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory and exercise of control over HIV infection. In: DiClemente RJ, Peterson JL, eds. Preventing AIDS: Theories and Methods of Behavioral Interventions. New York: Plenum; 1994: 25–59.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tsui EK, Leonard L, Lenoir C, Ellen JM. Poverty and sexual concurrency: a case study of STI risk. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19: 758–777.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hearn KM, O’Sullivan LF, El-Bassel N, Gilbert L. Intimate partner violence and monogamy among women in methadone treatment. AIDS Beh. 2005; 9(2): 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Doherty IA. Concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(12): 2230–2237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gilbert L, El-Bassel E, Schilling RF, Wada T, Bennet B. Partner violence and sexual HIV risk behaviors among women in methadone treatment. AIDS Beh. 2000; 4(3): 261–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Maman S, Campbell J, Sweat MD, Gielen AC. The intersections of HIV and violence: directions for future research and interventions. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50: 459–478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wu E, El-Bassel N, Witte SS, Gilbert L, Chang M. Intimate partner violence and HIV risk among urban minority women in primary health care settings. AIDS Behav. 2003; 7(3): 291–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Coker AL. Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health? A systematic review. Trauma Viol Abuse. 2007; 8(2): 149–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. El-Bassel N, Schilling R. 15-month follow-up of women methadone patients taught skills to reduce heterosexual HIV transmission. Public Health Rep. 1992; 107: 500–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tross S, Campbell ANC, Cohen LR, et al. Effectiveness of HIV/STD Sexual Risk Reduction Groups for Women in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs: results of a NIDA Clinical Trials Network Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2008; 48(5): 581–589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Meyer-Bahlburg H, Ehrhardt A, Exner TM, Gruen RS. Sexual Risk Behavior Assessment Schedule-Adult-Armory interview. New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sohler N, Colson PW, Meyer-Bahlburg HF, Susser E. Reliability of self reports about sexual risk behaviors for HIV among homeless men with severe mental illness. Psychiatr Serv. 2000; 51: 814–816.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jemmott JB, Jemmott LS. HIV behavioral interventions for adolescents in community settings. In: Peterson JL, DiClemente RJ, eds. Handbook of HIV Prevention. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2000: 103–127.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Metzger DS, Koblin B, Turner C, et al. Randomized controlled trial of audio computer-assisted self-interviewing: utility and acceptability in longitudinal studies. Am J Epidemiology. 2000; 152(2): 99–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9: 199–213.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Diggle P, Heagerty P, Liang K, Zeger S. Analysis of Longitudinal Data. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  47. SAS Institute. SAS software system for windows [computer program]. Version 9.1. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.; 2003.

  48. Anderson TL. Dimensions of women’s power in the illicit drug economy. Theor Criminology. 2005; 9(4): 371–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zierler S, Krieger N. Reframing women’s risk: social inequalities and HIV infection. Ann Rev Public Health. 1997; 18: 401–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Greig FE, Koopman C. Multilevel analysis of women’s empowerment and HIV prevention: quantitative survey results from a preliminary study in Botswana. AIDS Beh. 2003; 7(2): 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sherman SG, German D, Cheng Y, Marks M, Bailey-Kloche M. The evaluation of the JEWEL project: an innovative economic enhancement and HIV prevention intervention study targeting drug using women involved in prostitution. AIDS Care. 2006; 18(1): 1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dworkin SL, Blankenship K. Microfinance and HIV/AIDS prevention: assessing its promise and limitations. AIDS Behav. 2009; 13: 462–469.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Pronyk PM, Hargreaves JR, Kim JC, et al. Effect of a structural intervention for the prevention of intimate-partner violence and HIV in rural South Africa: a cluster randomized trial. Lancet. 2006; 368: 1973–1983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wyatt GE. The sociocultural relevance of sex research: challenges for the 1990’s and beyond. Am Psychol. 1994; 49(8): 748–754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Rhodes T, Singer M, Bourgois P, Friedman SR, Strathdee SA. The social structural production of HIV risk among injection drug users. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 61: 1026–1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Reid PT. Women, ethnicity, and AIDS: what’s love got to do with it? Sex Roles. 2000; 42(7/8): 709–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Soet JE, Dudley WN, Dilorio C. The effects of ethnicity and perceived power on women’s sexual behavior. Psychol Women Q. 1999; 23: 707–723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Soler H, Quadagno D, Sly DF, Riehman KS, Eberstein IW, Harrison DF. Relationship dynamics, ethnicity and condom use among low-income women. Fam Plann Perspect. 2000; 32(2): 82–88. 101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Remez L. Consistent condom use is rare among never-married American women, 1988 survey shows. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993; 25(6): 283–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kaufman MR, Shefer T, Crawford M, Simbayi LC, Kalichman SC. Gender attitudes, sexual power, HIV risk: a model for understanding HIV risk behavior of South African men. AIDS Care. 2008; 20(4): 434–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Parrado EA, Flippen CA, McQuiston C. Migration and relationship power among Mexican women. Demography. 2005; 42(2): 347–372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Heiman J, Heard-Davidson AR. Child sexual abuse and adult sexual relationships: review and perspective. In: Koenig LJ, Doll L, O'Leary A, Pequegnat W, eds. From Child Sexual Abuse to Adult Sexual Risk: Trauma, Revictimization, and Intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2004: 13–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Dworkin SL, Ehrhardt AA. Going beyond “ABC” to include “GEM”: critical reflections on progress in the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(1): 13–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse: Clinical Trials Network U10 DA13035 (Edward V. Nunes) and K24 DA022412 (Edward V. Nunes). We would like to thank the study participants and staff from the 12 community treatment programs and eight regional research and training centers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aimee N. C. Campbell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campbell, A.N.C., Tross, S., Dworkin, S.L. et al. Relationship Power and Sexual Risk among Women in Community-Based Substance Abuse Treatment. J Urban Health 86, 951–964 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9405-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9405-0

Keywords

Navigation