Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 363, Issue 9408, 14 February 2004, Page 566
The Lancet

Health and Human Rights
Distortions and difficulties in data for trafficking

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15548-7Get rights and content

References (3)

  • UN

    Protocol to prevent, suppress and punish trafficking in persons, especially women and children, supplementing the United Nations convention against transnational organized crime

    (2000)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • The effect of mobility on HIV-related healthcare access and use for female sex workers: A systematic review

    2018, Social Science and Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    The distinction between mobility and migration has also been made in the study of sex work (Reed et al., 2012). While a substantial literature has focused on trafficking, for the purposes of this review, we do not included trafficking in the definition of mobility although we recognize that there can be difficulties making a clear distinction (Butcher, 2003; Loff and Sanghera, 2004). For deprived populations, neither mobility or stasis deserve an “unwarranted veneer of free choice” (Wood, 1982) from failure to recognize the importance of inequities that dictate degrees of mobility in, among other things: incomes, political freedoms, gender relations, and social capital (Hagen-Zanker, 2008; Massey et al., 1993).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text