Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 382, Issue 9893, 24–30 August 2013, Pages 700-708
The Lancet

Articles
Dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV: week 48 results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SAILING study

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61221-0Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Dolutegravir (GSK1349572), a once-daily HIV integrase inhibitor, has shown potent antiviral response and a favourable safety profile. We evaluated safety, efficacy, and emergent resistance in antiretroviral-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive adults with HIV-1 with at least two-class drug resistance.

Methods

ING111762 (SAILING) is a 48 week, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study that began in October, 2010. Eligible patients had two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA assessments of 400 copies per mL or higher (unless >1000 copies per mL at screening), resistance to two or more classes of antiretroviral drugs, and had one to two fully active drugs for background therapy. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to once-daily dolutegravir 50 mg or twice-daily raltegravir 400 mg, with investigator-selected background therapy. Matching placebo was given, and study sites were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL at week 48, evaluated in all participants randomly assigned to treatment groups who received at least one dose of study drug, excluding participants at one site with violations of good clinical practice. Non-inferiority was prespecified with a 12% margin; if non-inferiority was established, then superiority would be tested per a prespecified sequential testing procedure. A key prespecified secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment-emergent integrase-inhibitor resistance. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01231516.

Findings

Analysis included 715 patients (354 dolutegravir; 361 raltegravir). At week 48, 251 (71%) patients on dolutegravir had HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL versus 230 (64%) patients on raltegravir (adjusted difference 7·4%, 95% CI 0·7 to 14·2); superiority of dolutegravir versus raltegravir was then concluded (p=0·03). Significantly fewer patients had virological failure with treatment-emergent integrase-inhibitor resistance on dolutegravir (four vs 17 patients; adjusted difference −3·7%, 95% CI −6·1 to −1·2; p=0·003). Adverse event frequencies were similar across groups; the most commonly reported events for dolutegravir versus raltegravir were diarrhoea (71 [20%] vs 64 [18%] patients), upper respiratory tract infection (38 [11%] vs 29 [8%]), and headache (33 [9%] vs 31 [9%]). Safety events leading to discontinuation were infrequent in both groups (nine [3%] dolutegravir, 14 [4%] raltegravir).

Interpretation

Once-daily dolutegravir, in combination with up to two other antiretroviral drugs, is well tolerated with greater virological effect compared with twice-daily raltegravir in this treatment-experienced patient group.

Funding

ViiV Healthcare.

Introduction

Although the first-generation integrase inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir are potent and well tolerated in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced adults with HIV,1, 2, 3, 4 improved integrase inhibitor-based therapy options would benefit these patients. Raltegravir requires twice-daily dosing5 and has variable pharmacokinetic characteristics. Elvitegravir must be taken with food and requires coadministration with a pharmacokinetic boosting agent, creating the potential for clinically significant drug interactions.6 Additionally, treatment-experienced patients who fail raltegravir-based or elvitegravir-based regimens commonly develop integrase inhibitor resistance; cross-resistance between raltegravir and elvitegravir has been reported.4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Thus, the development of new unboosted integrase inhibitors with once-daily dosing and an improved resistance profile is desirable.

Dolutegravir (GSK1349572) is a next-generation integrase inhibitor in clinical development. Dolutegravir dissociates slowly from integrase-DNA complexes (t½=71 h, wildtype integrase) in vitro,12 and has a 14-h plasma half-life in patients, supporting once-daily dosing without pharmacokinetic boosters.13 It has the potential for a high barrier to resistance and has shown potent efficacy in antiretroviral-naive patients and patients with multiclass resistance.14, 15, 16 No significant food effect or significant cytochrome P450 inhibition or induction has been observed, suggesting a low potential for interactions.13, 17

We report results from ING111762 (SAILING), comparing clinical efficacy, safety, and virology outcomes in treatment-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive patients who received dolutegravir 50 mg once daily or raltegravir 400 mg twice a day, plus investigator-selected background therapy.

Section snippets

Study design and patients

SAILING is an ongoing phase 3, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, double-placebo, multicentre, parallel-group, non-inferiority study in treatment-experienced, integrase-inhibitor-naive, adults with HIV-1 at 156 centres in Australia, Canada, Europe, Latin America, Taiwan, South Africa, and the USA (appendix). The screening period was Oct 26, 2010, to Jan 20, 2012. Eligible participants had two consecutive plasma HIV-1 RNA assessments of 400 copies per mL or higher (unless >1000 copies

Results

Of 1441 patients screened, 724 were randomly assigned to treatment groups and 719 received at least one dose of study drug (dolutegravir, 357; raltegravir, 362; figure 1). Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, treatment history, and background drugs and their activity were balanced across treatment groups (table 1). Because of broad geographical participation, the SAILING population was diverse in ethnicity, sex, and HIV-1 subtype (B [487 patients, 68%], C [103, 14%], and complex [42,

Discussion

SAILING is the first study to show superior virological efficacy of any antiretroviral drug over raltegravir (panel, figure 2). This difference was driven by fewer virological non-responders in the dolutegravir group compared with the raltegravir group. Additionally, there was significantly less treatment-emergent integrase inhibitor or background therapy resistance at failure.

Data from SAILING show that dolutegravir in combination with up to two additional ARTs has higher virological efficacy

References (29)

  • JL Lennox et al.

    Raltegravir versus efavirenz regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy, durability, subgroup, safety, and metabolic analyses

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (2010)
  • PE Sax et al.

    Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir versus co-formulated efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial, analysis of results after 48 weeks

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • RT Steigbigel et al.

    Raltegravir with optimized background therapy for resistant HIV-1 infection

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • JM Molina et al.

    Efficacy and safety of once daily elvitegravir versus twice daily raltegravir in treatment-experienced patients with HIV-1 receiving a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor: randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority study

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2012)
  • JJ Eron et al.

    Raltegravir once daily or twice daily in previously untreated patients with HIV-1: a randomised, active-controlled, phase 3 non-inferiority trial

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2011)
  • P German et al.

    Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of an integrase and novel pharmacoenhancer-containing single-tablet fixed-dose combination regimen for the treatment of HIV

    J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

    (2010)
  • DJ Hazuda et al.

    Resistance to the HIV-integrase inhibitor raltegravir: analysis of protocol 005, a phase II study in patients with triple-class resistant HIV-1 infection

    Antivir Ther

    (2007)
  • DJ McColl et al.

    Resistance and cross-resistance to first generation integrase inhibitors: insights from a phase II study of elvitegravir (GS-9137)

    Antivir Ther

    (2007)
  • DA Cooper et al.

    Subgroup and resistance analyses of raltegravir for resistant HIV-1 infection

    N Engl J Med

    (2008)
  • E DeJesus et al.

    Co-formulated elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus co-formulated emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial

    Lancet

    (2012)
  • C Garrido et al.

    Broad phenotypic cross-resistance to elvitegravir in HIV-infected patients failing on raltegravir-containing regimens

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2012)
  • KE Hightower et al.

    Dolutegravir (S/GSK1349572) exhibits significantly slower dissociation than raltegravir and elvitegravir from wild-type and integrase inhibitor-resistant HIV-1 integrase-DNA complexes

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2011)
  • S Min et al.

    Pharmacokinetics and safety of S/GSK1349572, a next-generation HIV integrase inhibitor, in healthy volunteers

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2010)
  • F Raffi et al.

    Once-daily dolutegravir versus raltegravir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection: 48 week results from the randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority SPRING-2 study

    Lancet

    (2013)
  • Cited by (454)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text