Elsevier

Clinical Therapeutics

Volume 24, Issue 1, January 2002, Pages 183-196
Clinical Therapeutics

Original research
A retrospective analysis of costs and patterns of treatment for external genital warts in the Netherlands

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2918(02)85014-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: External genital warts (EGWs) are one of the most common sexually transmitted infections, but little is known about the treatment patterns or resources used in the management of this condition.

Objective: The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to examine the patterns of treatment, resource utilization, and costs for EGWs in 3 dermatology clinics in the Netherlands.

Methods: A total of 530 completed episodes of care for EGWs were analyzed to identify patterns of treatment and resources used. Costs of care were calculated based on 4 cost components for each visit: labor costs, material costs, indirect costs, and extra costs.

Results: Across the 3 sites, men required an average of 5.78 clinic visits to achieve a completed episode of care; women required an average of 6.52 visits. The distribution of visits is highly skewed, however, with a median of 4.56 visits for men and 5.55 for women. More than 80% of patients were initially treated with monotherapy. Podophyllin and cryotherapy were the principal choices for initial therapy. The mean cost, in euros, of completing an episode of care was €221.34 for men and €292.29 for women. The cost per completed or successful episode of care was €395.92 for men and €485.05 for women. The distribution of costs was also skewed, with a relatively small group of patients accounting for a considerable proportion of overall costs. Although only 31.4% of male patients recorded ≥6 visits for a completed episode of care, this group accounted for 57.3% of the total costs of treatment for male patients. Among female patients, 43.4% had ≥6 visits, which accounted for 73.9% of the total costs of care for female patients. Costs also varied markedly by therapy sequence chosen. Patients who remained on their initial monotherapy or combination therapy had the lowest costs; the extent to which patients switched therapies substantially affected overall costs. For those patients initially treated with podophyllin, the mean total costs of treatment, taking into account the proportion who required a change in therapy, were €204.84 for men and €386.38 for women. For those initially treated with cryotherapy, the mean cost of treatment was €193.60 for men and €169.23 for women.

Conclusion: Current treatment options for EGWs do not appear to minimize resource utilization or help achieve complete episodes of care at the lowest possible cost.

References (13)

  • PC Langley et al.

    Modeling the impact of treatment options in genital warts: Patient-applied versus physician-administered therapies

    Clin Ther

    (1999)
  • TR Eng et al.
    (1997)
  • CJ Henquet et al.

    Sexually transmitted diseases in Limburg in 1997; prevalence according to a survey of family practitioners and specialists and according to reports from microbiological laboratories [in Dutch]

    Ned Tijdscher Geneeskd

    (2000)
  • LA Koutsky et al.

    Epidemiology of genital human papillomavirus infection

    Epidemiol Rev

    (1988)
  • MJ Strauss et al.

    The cost of treating genital warts

    Int J Dermatol

    (1996)
  • PC Langley et al.

    The cost-effectiveness of patient-applied versus provider-administered intervention strategies for the treatment of external genital warts

    Am J Managed Care

    (1999)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text