Abstract
Research on risk behaviors for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has revealed that they seldom correspond with actual risk of infection. Core groups of people with high-risk behavior who form networks of people linked by sexual contact are essential for STI transmission, but have been overlooked in epidemiological studies. Social network analysis, a subdiscipline of sociology, provides both the methods and analytical techniques to describe and illustrate the effects of sexual networks on STI transmission. Sexual networks of people from Colorado Springs, Colorado, and from Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, infected with chlamydia during a 6-month period were compared. In Winnipeg, 442 networks were identified, comprising 571 cases and 663 contacts, ranging in size from 2 to 20 individuals; Colorado Springs data yielded 401 networks, comprising 468 cases and 700 contacts, ranging in size from 2 to 12 individuals. Taking differing partner notification methods and the slightly smaller population size in Colorado Springs into account, the networks from both places were similar in both size and structure. These smaller, sparsely linked networks, peripheral to the core, may form the mechanism by which chlamydia can remain endemic, in contrast with larger, more densely connected networks, closer to the core, which are associated with steep rises in incidence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aral SO, Holmes KK. Epidemiology of sexual behavior and sexually, transmitted diseases. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, Lemon SM, Stamm WE, Piot P, Wasserheit JN, eds., Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2nd ed. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Information Services Company; 1990:19–36.
MacDonald NE, Wells GA, Fisher WA, et al. High-risk STD/HIV behaviour among college students. JAMA. 1990; 263:3155–3159.
Kost K, Forrest JD. American women's sexual behavior and exposure to risk of sexually transmitted diseases. Fam Flann Perspect. 1992;24:244–254.
Billy JOG, Tanfer K, Grady WR, Klepinger DH. The sexual behavior of men in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993;25:52–60.
Ku L, Sonenstein FL, Pleck JH. The association of AIDS education with sexual behavior and condom use among teenage men. Fam Plann Perspect 1992;24:100–106.
Turner R. Landmark French and British studies examine sexual behavior, including multiple partners, homosexuality. Fam Plann Perspect. 1993;25:91–92.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Sexual behavior among high school students—United States, 1990. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;40:885–888.
King AJC, Beazeley RP, Warren WK, Hankins CA. Canada Youth and AIDS Study. Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Social Program and Evaluation Group, Queen's University; 1988;1–147.
Blanchard JF, Moses S, Greenaway C, Orr P, Hammond GW, Brunham RC. The evolving epidemiology of chlamydial and gonococcal infections in response to control programs in Winnipeg, Canada. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1496–1502.
Rice RJ, Roberts PL, Handsfield HH, Holmes KK. Sociodemographic distribution of gonorrhea incidence: implications for prevention and behavioral research. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:1252–1258.
Rothenberg RB. The geography of gonorrhea. Am J Epidemiol. 1983;117:688–694.
Zimmerman HL, Potterat JJ, Dukes RL, et al. Epidemiologic differences between chlamydia and gonorrhea. Am J Public Health. 1990;80:1338–1342.
Shahmanesh M, Gayed S, Ashcroft M, et al. Geomapping of chlamydia and gonorrhoea in Birmingham. Sex Transm Infect. 2000;76:268–272.
Fishbein M, Jarvis B. Failure to find a behavioral surrogate for STD incidence—what does it really mean? Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:452–455.
Laumann EO, Gagnon JH, Michael RT, Michaels S. The Social Organization of Sexuality; Sexual Practices in the United States. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1994:1–718.
Brunham RC. Core group theory: a central concept in STD epidemiology. Venereology. 1997;10:34–39.
Rothenberg RB, Narramore J. The relevance of social network concepts to sexually transmitted disease control. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23:24–29.
Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE. Personal risk taking and the spread of disease: beyond core groups. J Infect Dis. 1996;174 (suppl 2):S144-S149.
Klovdahl AS, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Muth JB, Muth SQ, Darrow WW. Social networks and infectious disease: the Colorado Springs Study. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38: 79–88.
Borgatti SP, Everett MG. Models of core/periphery structures. Soc Networks. 1999;21: 375–395.
Wasserman S, Faust K Social Network Analysis. 1st ed. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1994:34.
Rekart ML, Patrick D, Jolly AM, et al. Mass treatment/prophylaxis during an outbreak of infectious syphilis in Vancouver, British Columbia. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2000;26:101–105.
Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Bethea R.P. Chronicle of a gang STD outbreak foretoldree Inquiry Creative Sociol. 1996;24:11–16.
Rothenberg RB, Sterk C, Toomey KE, et al. Using social network and ethnographic tools to evaluate syphilis transmission. Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25:154–160.
Rothenberg R, Kimbrough L, Lewis-Hardy R, et al. Social network methods for endemic foci of syphilis: a pilot project. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:12–18.
Ghani AC, Donnelly CA, Garnett GP. Sampling biases and missing data in explorations of sexual partner networks for the spread of sexually transmitted diseases. Stat Med. 1998;17:2079–2097.
Brewer DD, Garrett SB, Kula singam S. Forgetting as a cause of incomplete reporting of sexual and drug injection partners. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:166–176.
Ghani AC, Ison CA, Ward H, et al. Sexual partner networks in the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases. An analysis of gonorrhea cases in Sheffield, UK. Transm Dis. 1996;23:498–503.
Day S, Ward H, Ison C, Bell G, Weber J. Sexual networks: the integration of social and genetic data. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1981–1992.
Pierce RL, Thomas JC, Sparling PF, et al. An epidemiological evaluation of the use of microbiological tools for identifying gonorrhoea infection networks. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10:316–323.
Wylie JL, Maclean I, Brunham R, Craig C, Jolly AM. Gonorrhea types and sexual networks in Manitoba, Canada. Paper presented at: Sunbelt 19th International Sunbelt Social Network Conference; February 18–21, 1999; Charleston, SC.
Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Woodhouse DE, Muth JB, Pratts CI, Fogle JS. Gonorrhea as a social disease. Sex Transm Dis. 1985;12:25–32.
Wylie JL, Jolly AM. Sexual network analysis of chlamydia and gonorrhea transmission in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Dis. 2001;28:14–24.
Hill A. The environment and disease: association or causation. Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58:295–300.
Hethcote HW, Yorke JA, Nold A. Gonorrhea modeling: a comparison of control methods. Math Biosci. 1982;58:93–109.
Klovdahl AS. Social networks and the spread of infectious diseases: the AIDS example. Soc Sci Med. 1985;21:1203–1216.
Centers for Disease, Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 1996. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services; 1997;1–104.
Jolly AM, Hammond G, Orr PH, Young TK. Risk factors for infection in women undergoing testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Manitoba, Canada. Sex Transm Dis. 1995;22:289–295.
Lacey CJ, Merrick DW, Bensley DC, Fairley I. Analysis of the sociodemography of gonorrhoea in Leeds, 1989–93. BMJ 1997;314:1715–1718.
Ellen JM, Aral SO, Madger LS. Do differences in sexual behaviors a ccount for the racial/ethnic differences in adolescents' self-reported history of a sexually transmitted disease? Sex Transm Dis. 1998;25:125–129.
Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999; 26:250–261.
Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious Diseases of Humans; Dynamics and Control. 1st ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1992;234.
Potterat JJ, Zimmerman-Rogers H, Muth SQ, et al. Chlamydia transmission: concurrency, reproduction number, and the epidemic trajectory. Am J Epidemiol. 1999;150: 1331–1339.
Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, Brody S. Evidence undermining the a dequacy of the HIV reproduction number formula. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:644–645.
Ghani AC, Swinton J, Garnett GP. The role of sexual partnership networks in the epidemiology of gonorrhea. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:45–56.
Kretzschmar M. Sexual network structure and sexually transmitted disease prevention: a modeling perspective. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:627–635.
Anderson RM, Garnett GP. Mathematical models of the transmission and control of sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:636–643.
Ferguson NM, Garnett GP. More realistic models of sexually transmitted disease transmission dynamics: sexual partnership networks, pair models, and moment closur Sex Transm Dis. 2000;27:600–609.
Communicable Disease Control. Notifiable Diseases Manitoba: CDC Unit Annual Review; Calendar Year 1996. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Manitoba Health; 1997.
Rasooly I, Millson ME, Frank JW, et al. A survey of public health partner notification for sexually transmitted diseases in Canada. Can J Public Health. 1994; 85(suppl 1): S48-S52.
Zimmerman-Rogers H, Potterat JJ, Muth SQ, et al. Establishing efficient partner notification periods for patients with chlamydia. Sex Transm Dis. 1999;26:49–54.
Batagelj V, Mrvar A, Pajek—Program for Large Network Analysis [computer program]. Version 0.58. Ljubjana, Slovenia: University of Ljubjana. Available at: http://vlado.fmf.uni-lj.si/networks/pajek.2000.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jolly, A.M., Muth, S.Q., Wylie, J.L. et al. Sexual networks and sexually transmitted infections: A tale of two cities. J Urban Health 78, 433–445 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.433
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.433