Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Marginalized and Socially Integrated Groups of IDUs in Hungary: Potential bridges of HIV infection

  • Original Articles: Various Topics
  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The discrepancy in HIV rates among Eastern and central European injecting drug users (IDUs) suggests that, in addition to risk behaviors, social contact patterns also play an important role. We identify two groups of IDUs in Budapest, Hungary, marginalized IDUs (M-IDUs) and socially integrated IDUs (SI-IDUs) and compare their HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) social and risk network characteristics, risk behaviors, and travel patterns. Between May 2003 and January 2004, 29 nontreatment-recruited young IDUs in Budapest participated in ethnographic interviews and focus groups. The mean age was 23.6 years (SD=3.6); eight were female and two Roma/Gypsy. Most injected heroin (n=23) and/or amphetamines (n=10) in the past 30 days. M-IDUs had no legal employment, injected heroin and sniffed glue, and stopped using drugs in treatment/prison. SI-IDUs had regular jobs or were students, injected heroin and sniffed cocaine, and stopped using drugs before exams/tests. Both M-IDUs and SI-IDUs shared injecting equipment on occasion and used condoms rarely. M-IDUs had a large social network of “buddies” and a small risk network of “friends.” SI-IDUs had two separate large social networks of “buddies”: a M-IDU and a non-IDU network; and a small risk network of “friends.”Both groups reported monogamous sexual relationships. M-IDUs traveled within Hungary, whereas SI-IDUs traveled to Western Europe. If an HIV epidemic among IDUs in Hungary is not prevented, SI-IDUs may form a potential “bridge” of HIV infection between high-risk IDU populations and the low-risk general population, whereas M-IDUs may become cores of infection. Different approaches may be appropriate for M-IDUs and SI-IDUs to prevent HIV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atlani L, Carael M, Brunet JB, et al. Social change and HIV in the former USSR: the making of a new epidemic. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1547–1556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kelly JA, Amirkhanian YA. The newest epidemic: a review of HIV/AIDS in Central and Eastern Europe. Int J STD AIDS. 2003;14:361–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benotsch EG, Somlai AM, Pinkerton SD, et al. Drug use and sexual risk behaviours among female Russian IDUs who exchange sex for money or drugs. Int J STD AIDS. 2004;15:343–347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amirkhanian YA, Kelly JA, Kabakchieva E, et al. Evaluation of a social network HIV prevention intervention program for young men who have sex with men in Russia and Bulgaria. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:205–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamers FF, Downs AM. HIV in central and eastern Europe. Lancet. 2003;361:1035–1044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. European Centre for the Epidemiological Monitoring of AIDS. HIV/AIDS Surveillance in Europe, Mid-Year Report 2003. Saint Maurice, Canada: Institute de Veille Sanitaire; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rhodes T, Ball A, Stimson GV, et al. HIV infection associated with drug injecting in the newly independent states, eastern Europe: the social and economic context of epidemics. Addiction. 1999;94:1323–1336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Annual Report on the State of the Drugs Problem in the European Union and Norway 2002. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ujhelyi E, Tarjan V, Szomor K, et al. Prevalence of HIV, HBsAg, and HCV infection among Hungarian drug users. In: 12th World AIDS Conference; July 1998; Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract 60099.

  10. Zacher G. Drogtúladagolások-fovárosi helyzet. In: Ritter I, Felvinczi K, eds. Jelentés a Magyarországi Kábítószerhelyzetrol. Budapest, Hungary: Gyermek, Ifjúsági és Sportminisztérium; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stark K, Sieroslawski J, Muller R, et al. Determinants of current HIV risk behavior among injecting drug users in Warsaw, Poland. Eur J Epidemiol. 1996;12:315–317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mikl J, Vyslouzilova S, Bruckova M, et al. High rate of HIV risk behaviors among drug users in Prague, Czech Republic 1996–1997. In: 12th World AIDS Conference; June 28–July 3, 1998. Abstract 23197.

  13. Trotter IIRT, Bowen AM, Potter JM Jr. Network models for HIV outreach and prevention programs for drug users. NIDA Research Monograph. 1995;151:144–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neaigus A. The network approach and interventions to prevent HIV among injection drug users. Public Health Rep. 1998;113:140–150.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Curtis R, et al. The relevance of drug injectors’ social networks and risk networks for understanding and preventing HIV infection. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:67–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sifaneck S, Neaigus A. The ethnographic accessing, sampling and screening of hidden populations: heroin sniffers in New York City. Addict Res Theory. 2001;9:519–543.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dehne KL, Khodakevich L, Hamers FF, et al. The HIV/AIDS epidemic in eastern Europe: recent patterns and trends and their implications for policy-making. AIDS. 1999;13:741–749.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sejda J, Studnickova B, Polanecky V. Trends in the incidence of problematic drug addicts in the Czech Republic, 1995–1996. Cent Eur J Public Health. 1998;6:18–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly JA, Amirkhanian YA, Kabakchieva E, et al. Gender roles and HIV sexual risk vulnerability of Roma (Gypsies) men and women in Bulgaria and Hungary: an ethnographic study. AIDS Care. 2004;16:231–245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sherman SG, Latkin CA. Intimate relationship characteristics associated with condom use among drug users and their sex partners: a multilevel analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;64:97–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Booth RE. Gender differences in high-risk sex behaviours among heterosexual drug injectors and crack smokers. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1995;21:419–432.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Montgomery SB, Hyde J, De Rosa CJ, et al. Gender differences in HIV risk behaviors among young injectors and their social network members. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2002;28:453–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Booth RE, Mikulich-Gilbertson SK, Brewster JT, et al. Predictors of self-reported HIV infection among drug injectors in Ukraine. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:82–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gore-Felton C, Somlai AM, Benotsch EG, et al. The influence of gender on factors associated with HIV transmission risk among young Russian injection drug users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29:881–894.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Somlai AM, Kelly JA, Benotsch E, et al. Characteristics and predictors of HIV risk behaviors among injection-drug-using men and women in St. Petersburg, Russia. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002;14:295–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rhodes T, Judd A, Mikhailova L, et al. Injecting equipment sharing among injecting drug users in Togliatti City, Russian Federation: maximizing the protective effects of syringe distribution. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004;35:293–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alcabes P, Vlahov D, Anthony JC. Characteristics of intravenous drug users by history of arrest and treatment for drug use. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992;180:48–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gyarmathy VA, Neaigus A, Számadó S. HIV risk behavior history of prison inmates in Hungary. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003;15:561–569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Gyarmathy VA, Racz J, Neaigus A, et al. The urgent need for HIV and hepatitis prevention in drug treatment programs in Hungary. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:276–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Vlahov D, Junge B, Brookmeyer R, et al. Reductions in high-risk drug use behaviors among participants in the Baltimore needle exchange program. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1997;16:400–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vlahov D, Junge B. The role of needle exchange programs in HIV prevention. Public Health Rep. 1998;113:75–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Galea S, Vlahov D. Social determinants and the health of drug users: socioeconomic status, homelessness, and incarceration. Public Health Rep. 2002;117:S135-S145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Buka SL. Disparities in health status and substance use: ethnicity and socioeconomic factors. Public Health Rep. 2002;117:S118-S125.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rhodes T, Stimson GV, Crofts N, et al. Drug injecting, rapid HIV spread, and the risk environment: implications for assessment and response. AIDS. 1999;13:S259-S269.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Steffen R, deBernardis C, Banos A. Travel epidemiology — a global perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003;21:89–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Des Jarlais DC, Carballo M. HIV and injecting drug use. AIDS Soc. 1993;4:11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gezairy HA. Travel epidemiology: WHO perspective. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2003; 21:86–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Latkin CA, Sherman S, Knowlton A. HIV prevention among drug users: outcome of a network-oriented peer outreach intervention. Health Psychol. 2003;22:332–339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Latkin CA, Hua W, Davey MA. Factors associated with peer HIV prevention outreach in drug-using communities. AIDS Educ Prev. 2004;16:499–508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Latkin CA, Mandell W, Vlahov D, et al. The long-term outcome of a personal network-oriented HIV prevention intervention for injection drug users: the SAFE Study. Am J Community Psychol. 1996;24:341–364.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Latkin CA. A personal network approach to AIDS prevention: an experimental peer group intervention for street-injecting drug users: the SAFE Study. NIDA Res Monogr. 1995;151:181–195.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Latkin CA. Outreach in natural settings: the use of peer leaders for HIV prevention among injecting drug users’ networks. Public Health Rep. 1998;113:151–159.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Padian NS, O’Brien TR, Chang Y, et al. Prevention of heterosexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus through couple counseling. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 1993;6:1043–1048.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Anna Gyarmathy PhD, MS, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gyarmathy, V.A., Neaigus, A. Marginalized and Socially Integrated Groups of IDUs in Hungary: Potential bridges of HIV infection. J Urban Health 82 (Suppl 4), iv101–iv112 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti112

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/jti112

Keywords

Navigation