Sampling individuals with large sexual networks: an evaluation of four approaches

Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Apr;28(4):200-7. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200104000-00003.

Abstract

Background: Methods for accessing large sexual networks are essential for investigating the mechanisms for the spread of sexually transmitted infections.

Goal: Four samples of cases were compared with the total population to determine which identified the largest networks.

Study design: Individuals with positive test results for chlamydia during a 6-month period were selected from a laboratory database and linked with sex partner information from a notifiable disease registry. Sexual networks were constructed for a random sample, people with positive results from two or more tests for chlamydia, people with positive tests results for both gonorrhea and chlamydia, and the preceding two groups combined.

Results: The coinfected people combined with the repeaters yielded the highest proportion (47.8%) of large networks (>10 people), followed by the coinfected people, the repeaters, and finally the random sample.

Conclusions: People coinfected with chlamydia and gonorrhea and those with repeated chlamydial infection present ideal opportunities for both research and prevention.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Chlamydia Infections / epidemiology
  • Chlamydia Infections / prevention & control
  • Chlamydia Infections / transmission*
  • Contact Tracing
  • Databases, Factual
  • Disease Transmission, Infectious / prevention & control
  • Disease Transmission, Infectious / statistics & numerical data*
  • Female
  • Gonorrhea / epidemiology
  • Gonorrhea / prevention & control
  • Gonorrhea / transmission*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Manitoba / epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Sexual Partners*
  • Social Support