Comparative cost-effectiveness of the quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a transmission-dynamic modeling study

Vaccine. 2013 Aug 20;31(37):3863-71. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.06.064. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

Abstract

Background: The quadrivalent and bivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are now licensed in several countries. We compared the cost-effectiveness of the HPV vaccines to provide evidence for policy decisions.

Methods: We developed HPV-ADVISE, a multi-type individual-based transmission-dynamic model of HPV infection and disease (anogenital warts, and cervical, anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers). We calibrated the model to sexual behavior and epidemiologic data from Canada, and estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) lost and costs ($CAN 2010) from the literature. Vaccine-type efficacy was based on a systematic literature review. The analysis was performed from the healthcare provider perspective, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3%. Predictions are presented using the median [10th;90th percentiles] of simulations.

Results: Under base-case assumptions (vaccinating 10-year-old girls, 80% coverage, $95/dose), using the quadrivalent and bivalent vaccines is estimated to cost $15,528 [12,056;19,140] and $20,182 [15,531;25,240] per QALY-gained, respectively. At equal price, the quadrivalent vaccine is more cost-effective than bivalent under all scenarios investigated, except when assuming longer duration of protection for the bivalent and minimal anogenital warts burden. Under base-case assumptions, the maximum additional cost per dose for the quadrivalent vaccine to remain more cost-effective than the bivalent is $32 [17;46] (using a $40,000/QALY-gained threshold). Results were most sensitive to discounting, time-horizon, differences in durations of protection and anogenital warts burden.

Conclusions: Vaccinating pre-adolescent girls against HPV is predicted to be highly cost-effective. If equally priced, the quadrivalent is the most economically desirable vaccine. However, ultimately, the most cost-effective HPV vaccine will be determined by their relative price.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Cost-effectiveness; Economic analysis; HPV vaccination; Mathematical modeling.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Canada
  • Child
  • Condylomata Acuminata / economics
  • Condylomata Acuminata / prevention & control
  • Condylomata Acuminata / virology
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Models, Economic
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / economics
  • Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / prevention & control
  • Oropharyngeal Neoplasms / virology
  • Papillomavirus Infections / economics
  • Papillomavirus Infections / transmission*
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines / administration & dosage
  • Papillomavirus Vaccines / economics*
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years
  • Sexual Behavior
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / economics
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / prevention & control
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / virology
  • Vaccination / economics
  • Vaccination / methods

Substances

  • Papillomavirus Vaccines