Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My NCBI Filters

Results by year

Table representation of search results timeline featuring number of search results per year.

Year Number of Results
2010 2
2011 1
2012 5
2013 1
2024 0

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Publication date

Search Results

8 results

Results by year

Filters applied: . Clear all
Page 1
Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation.
van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, Kretzschmar M, Over EA, Schmid BV, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, van der Sande MA, de Wit GA, Low N, Op de Coul EL. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: van ravesteijn sm. BMJ. 2012 Jul 5;345:e4316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e4316. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22767614 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands.
van Bergen JE, Fennema JS, van den Broek IV, Brouwers EE, de Feijter EM, Hoebe CJ, Koekenbier RH, de Coul EL, van Ravesteijn SM, Götz HM. van Bergen JE, et al. Among authors: van ravesteijn sm. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Oct 7;10:293. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-293. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20925966 Free PMC article.
High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infections.
Götz HM, van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, Brouwers EE, Pars LL, Fennema JS, Koekenbier RH, van Ravesteijn S, Op de Coul EL, van Bergen J. Götz HM, et al. Among authors: van ravesteijn s. Sex Transm Infect. 2013 Feb;89(1):63-9. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050455. Epub 2012 Jun 23. Sex Transm Infect. 2013. PMID: 22728910
Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis.
van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, de Feijter EM, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Koekenbier RH, van Ravesteijn SM, de Coul EL. van den Broek IV, et al. Among authors: van ravesteijn sm. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Apr 7;10:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-89. BMC Infect Dis. 2010. PMID: 20374635 Free PMC article.
Keeping participants on board: increasing uptake by automated respondent reminders in an Internet-based chlamydia screening in the Netherlands.
Dokkum NF, Koekenbier RH, van den Broek IV, van Bergen JE, Brouwers EE, Fennema JS, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, Pars LL, van Ravesteijn SM, Op de Coul EL. Dokkum NF, et al. Among authors: van ravesteijn sm. BMC Public Health. 2012 Mar 9;12:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-176. BMC Public Health. 2012. PMID: 22404911 Free PMC article.